From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBAAE2C032E for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768216022; cv=none; b=BXosY4qJw5qw8ljrwYlEjGLlqijFBenPmVSXD6nv2Z5ew/D27Qu5znFjbDDABSNEN8L94eBgn9rtu2UEyVaMfgG9C2uoIa8SGulX+uFOKKzP6BaeNv3sGcw1sU1RUg2DYYZER18sRnJBgwdEUGewX0Z7E/hwObVl9KgxCME8n4Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768216022; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ot1FtlgnW/xeJevdu3FIe6BN4TMmzQ3M7PEDHxncLEM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tjBPFx60ApMdScg55MukFmyomslBhX3Mlqk6oznrwuxUvc2f1k7Ji2ic5ULfPBZhaXkmvvaW5dvNtQKPaTfzlnHhdoxajM/IzGBHZsxPFOjZ8vz0FKSw8D+b9l19azJKgjyZHUBm94tZWjjxSb/yYHxEybAB2gA46QxpkYUlLmI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=pP/5L8Tf; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=XZbydRbf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="pP/5L8Tf"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="XZbydRbf" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 12:06:57 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1768216019; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3sycsH7/f9R8zgn0tqtLRl0dS4rgSITJ+BUrkf21FCU=; b=pP/5L8TfSd7n4xsUNeeej3WdP4M9YfdXA3pUi2uburVtQEKZG0i/prAD6v9U6tmqOtZ4GQ hX2UDtNRssA5z+kC0Uoixn2WSz4sRIynXpb3/SUIqGCxJs9yq+ogA6J3UYMU0c3PfvEfRX aBA88uZvyJbOtnr22CVA2RRD9BGkweKnmXoj5fuw8sKlqJfaqy8H6cYBDNya5JzAurS9yv gMqmH9Uxq42hhe+f4SK5I6oNNfesVJZbxwrfSdKFE+DMGTP4CuBIO30It95O1GLFFMyIzO 7jlDtEykvulDfSwmqLACM50ZZHFvSrrSOBNJlU9jfwlwtOuNTGHTRaZMK033ow== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1768216019; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3sycsH7/f9R8zgn0tqtLRl0dS4rgSITJ+BUrkf21FCU=; b=XZbydRbf9QLgYHUGp9y6gYuhINUzljq39uy+roVd2iCtO1goEQvXJekziFfGuA00HuTVFx SSs5BAUN9mik7TBw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Thomas Gleixner , "enlin.mu" Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org, ryotkkr98@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, enlin.mu@unisoc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] softirq: Print the function name Message-ID: <20260112110657.a4ZB4zgB@linutronix.de> References: <20260105094133.3542-1-enlin.mu@linux.dev> <252851c4-c7a0-49b1-9fca-f1bac04b588f@linux.dev> <87v7hbss1p.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <87v7hbss1p.ffs@tglx> On 2026-01-08 22:39:14 [+0100], Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06 2026 at 14:16, enlin.mu wrote: > > On 2026/1/5 17:41, Enlin Mu wrote: > >> Adjust the printing format from the function address to > >> the function name. =E2=80=A6 > The TIMER softirq always invoked run_timer_softirq(). If that happens > then the interesting question is not the softirq action handler, but any > function it invoked from there. So there is _zero_ value of adding this. Removing h->action from the print would be an improvement. > Thanks, >=20 > tglx Sebastian