From: Minu Jin <s9430939@naver.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: ovidiu.panait.oss@gmail.com, gshahrouzi@gmail.com,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Minu Jin <s9430939@naver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] staging: axis-fifo: introduce helper functions for register access
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 22:38:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260113133831.3422480-2-s9430939@naver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260113133831.3422480-1-s9430939@naver.com>
This patch introduces axis_fifo_read_reg(), axis_fifo_write_reg()
to wrap raw ioread32, iowrite32 calls. Using these helper functions
improves code readability and provides a cleaner abstraction for
hardware register access.
All existing single register I/O calls updated to use these
new helpers. This refactoring also ensures a consistent access
pattern and makes future maintenance easier.
Signed-off-by: Minu Jin <s9430939@naver.com>
---
drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
index 509d620d6ce7..525156583c4a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
@@ -145,16 +145,26 @@ struct axis_fifo_debug_reg {
* ----------------------------
*/
+static inline u32 axis_fifo_read_reg(struct axis_fifo *fifo, int offset)
+{
+ return ioread32(fifo->base_addr + offset);
+}
+
+static inline void axis_fifo_write_reg(struct axis_fifo *fifo, int offset, u32 val)
+{
+ iowrite32(val, fifo->base_addr + offset);
+}
+
static void reset_ip_core(struct axis_fifo *fifo)
{
- iowrite32(XLLF_SRR_RESET_MASK, fifo->base_addr + XLLF_SRR_OFFSET);
- iowrite32(XLLF_TDFR_RESET_MASK, fifo->base_addr + XLLF_TDFR_OFFSET);
- iowrite32(XLLF_RDFR_RESET_MASK, fifo->base_addr + XLLF_RDFR_OFFSET);
- iowrite32(XLLF_INT_TC_MASK | XLLF_INT_RC_MASK | XLLF_INT_RPURE_MASK |
+ axis_fifo_write_reg(fifo, XLLF_SRR_OFFSET, XLLF_SRR_RESET_MASK);
+ axis_fifo_write_reg(fifo, XLLF_TDFR_OFFSET, XLLF_TDFR_RESET_MASK);
+ axis_fifo_write_reg(fifo, XLLF_RDFR_OFFSET, XLLF_RDFR_RESET_MASK);
+ axis_fifo_write_reg(fifo, XLLF_IER_OFFSET, XLLF_INT_TC_MASK |
+ XLLF_INT_RC_MASK | XLLF_INT_RPURE_MASK |
XLLF_INT_RPORE_MASK | XLLF_INT_RPUE_MASK |
- XLLF_INT_TPOE_MASK | XLLF_INT_TSE_MASK,
- fifo->base_addr + XLLF_IER_OFFSET);
- iowrite32(XLLF_INT_CLEAR_ALL, fifo->base_addr + XLLF_ISR_OFFSET);
+ XLLF_INT_TPOE_MASK | XLLF_INT_TSE_MASK);
+ axis_fifo_write_reg(fifo, XLLF_ISR_OFFSET, XLLF_INT_CLEAR_ALL);
}
/**
@@ -192,7 +202,7 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
if (!mutex_trylock(&fifo->read_lock))
return -EAGAIN;
- if (!ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_RDFO_OFFSET)) {
+ if (!axis_fifo_read_reg(fifo, XLLF_RDFO_OFFSET)) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto end_unlock;
}
@@ -203,7 +213,7 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
*/
mutex_lock(&fifo->read_lock);
ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fifo->read_queue,
- ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_RDFO_OFFSET),
+ axis_fifo_read_reg(fifo, XLLF_RDFO_OFFSET),
read_timeout);
if (ret <= 0) {
@@ -218,7 +228,7 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
}
}
- bytes_available = ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_RLR_OFFSET);
+ bytes_available = axis_fifo_read_reg(fifo, XLLF_RLR_OFFSET);
words_available = bytes_available / sizeof(u32);
if (!bytes_available) {
dev_err(fifo->dt_device, "received a packet of length 0\n");
@@ -334,8 +344,7 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
if (!mutex_trylock(&fifo->write_lock))
return -EAGAIN;
- if (words_to_write > ioread32(fifo->base_addr +
- XLLF_TDFV_OFFSET)) {
+ if (words_to_write > axis_fifo_read_reg(fifo, XLLF_TDFV_OFFSET)) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto end_unlock;
}
@@ -347,7 +356,7 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
*/
mutex_lock(&fifo->write_lock);
ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fifo->write_queue,
- ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_TDFV_OFFSET)
+ axis_fifo_read_reg(fifo, XLLF_TDFV_OFFSET)
>= words_to_write,
write_timeout);
@@ -373,7 +382,7 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
iowrite32(txbuf[i], fifo->base_addr + XLLF_TDFD_OFFSET);
/* write packet size to fifo */
- iowrite32(len, fifo->base_addr + XLLF_TLR_OFFSET);
+ axis_fifo_write_reg(fifo, XLLF_TLR_OFFSET, len);
ret = len;
kvfree(txbuf);
@@ -388,8 +397,8 @@ static irqreturn_t axis_fifo_irq(int irq, void *dw)
struct axis_fifo *fifo = dw;
u32 isr, ier, intr;
- ier = ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_IER_OFFSET);
- isr = ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_ISR_OFFSET);
+ ier = axis_fifo_read_reg(fifo, XLLF_IER_OFFSET);
+ isr = axis_fifo_read_reg(fifo, XLLF_ISR_OFFSET);
intr = ier & isr;
if (intr & XLLF_INT_RC_MASK)
@@ -414,7 +423,7 @@ static irqreturn_t axis_fifo_irq(int irq, void *dw)
dev_err(fifo->dt_device,
"transmit length mismatch error interrupt\n");
- iowrite32(XLLF_INT_CLEAR_ALL, fifo->base_addr + XLLF_ISR_OFFSET);
+ axis_fifo_write_reg(fifo, XLLF_ISR_OFFSET, XLLF_INT_CLEAR_ALL);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -464,7 +473,7 @@ static int axis_fifo_debugfs_regs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
struct axis_fifo *fifo = m->private;
for (reg = regs; reg->name; ++reg) {
- u32 val = ioread32(fifo->base_addr + reg->offset);
+ u32 val = axis_fifo_read_reg(fifo, reg->offset);
seq_printf(m, "%*s: 0x%08x\n", AXIS_FIFO_DEBUG_REG_NAME_MAX_LEN,
reg->name, val);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 13:38 [PATCH 0/2] staging: axis-fifo: I/O accessor cleanups Minu Jin
2026-01-13 13:38 ` Minu Jin [this message]
2026-01-13 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: axis-fifo: Use bulk I/O accessors for data transfers Minu Jin
2026-01-14 12:17 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260113133831.3422480-2-s9430939@naver.com \
--to=s9430939@naver.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gshahrouzi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ovidiu.panait.oss@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®