From: Chunsheng Luo <luochunsheng@ustc.edu>
To: miklos@szeredi.hu
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chunsheng Luo <luochunsheng@ustc.edu>
Subject: [RFC 0/2] fuse/passthrough: simplify daemon crash recovery
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:20:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260115072032.402-1-luochunsheng@ustc.edu> (raw)
To simplify FUSE daemon crash recovery and reduce performance overhead,
passthrough backing_id information is not persisted. However, this
approach introduces two challenges after daemon restart:
1. Non-persistent backing_ids prevent proper resource cleanup, leading
to resource leaks.
2. New backing_ids allocated for the same FUSE file cause -EIO errors
due to strict fuse_backing validation in
fuse_inode_uncached_io_start(), even when accessing the same
backing file. This persists until all previously opened files are
closed.
There are common scenarios where reusing the cached fuse_inode->fb is
safe:
Scenario 1: The same backing file (with identical inode) is
re-registered after recovery.
Scenario 2: In a read-only FUSE filesystem, the backing file may be
cleaned up and re-downloaded (resulting in a different
inode, but identical content).
Proposed Solution:
1. Enhance fuse_dev_ioctl_backing_close() to support closing all
backing_ids at once, enabling comprehensive resource cleanup after
restart.
2. Introduce the FOPEN_PASSTHROUGH_INODE_CACHE flag. When set during
fuse_open(), the kernel prioritizes reusing the existing
fuse_backing cached in fuse_inode, falling back to the
backing_id-associated fb only if the cache is empty.
I'd appreciate any feedback on whether there are better approaches or
potential improvements to this solution.
Thanks.
---
Chunsheng Luo (2):
fuse: add close all in passthrough backing close for crash recovery
fuse: Add new flag to reuse the backing file of fuse_inode
fs/fuse/backing.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
fs/fuse/dev.c | 5 +++++
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 1 +
fs/fuse/iomode.c | 2 +-
fs/fuse/passthrough.c | 11 +++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/fuse.h | 2 ++
6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-15 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-15 7:20 Chunsheng Luo [this message]
2026-01-15 7:20 ` [RFC 1/2] fuse: add close all in passthrough backing close for " Chunsheng Luo
2026-01-15 12:23 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-01-15 13:30 ` Chunsheng Luo
2026-01-15 7:20 ` [RFC 2/2] fuse: Add new flag to reuse the backing file of fuse_inode Chunsheng Luo
2026-01-15 13:09 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-01-15 14:34 ` Chunsheng Luo
2026-01-15 15:31 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-01-16 2:43 ` Chunsheng Luo
2026-01-16 19:08 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-01-17 15:26 ` Chunsheng Luo
2026-01-15 15:43 ` [RFC 0/2] fuse/passthrough: simplify daemon crash recovery Amir Goldstein
2026-01-16 1:57 ` Chunsheng Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260115072032.402-1-luochunsheng@ustc.edu \
--to=luochunsheng@ustc.edu \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®