Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix potential OOB access in ocfs2_adjust_adjacent_records()

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 07:23:18PM +0000, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> In ocfs2_adjust_adjacent_records(), the code dereferences
> right_child_el->l_recs[0] without verifying that the extent list
> actually contains any records.
> 
> If right_child_el->l_next_free_rec is 0 (e.g., due to a corrupted
> filesystem image), this results in an out-of-bounds access when
> accessing l_recs[0].e_cpos.
> 
> In contrast, ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_records() explicitly validates
> that l_next_free_rec is non-zero before accessing records.
> 
> This patch adds a check to ensure l_next_free_rec is not zero before
> proceeding. If the list is empty, we log an error and return to avoid
> reading invalid data.
> 
> Fixes: dcd0538ff4e8 ("ocfs2: sparse b-tree support")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> index 58bf58b68955..bc6f26613e6e 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> @@ -1974,6 +1974,11 @@ static void ocfs2_adjust_adjacent_records(struct ocfs2_extent_rec *left_rec,
>  {
>  	u32 left_clusters, right_end;
>  
> +	if (le16_to_cpu(right_child_el->l_next_free_rec) == 0) {
> +		mlog(ML_ERROR, "Extent list has no records\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Interior nodes never have holes. Their cpos is the cpos of
>  	 * the leftmost record in their child list. Their cluster
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>