From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BAB93AEF23; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768840230; cv=none; b=GDRGN28IAvRoWPyDfoBT8ehWX99yBiJEszMVN/Sb+LS0LCy9bUuAsMCr7I5EOxY/JA9tA8Oe27Np+PR1A4DKdJyD/h1e2J+EVJ+jl8hDiv3zhpKo6EC6swWG/2gdhDJ8uqq7aNEwsSQK40A99IU3VcTwUOizlMKW3HzIhxVFPgQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768840230; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sdGG5M09hkzsJSFJ0MO46ADpx7k88eDsXuroOJ6H/mk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=K/6SEkXddaOGbpaVIcrKScdh3lYmwFJtONNGKcl5XvgPZXwyxolAab2uM4xUa+ONUjFW4RxAn3bkXX0bpzgH7lxjxkPsd3o5GC+27xOUhmQpZwPxiQ0/pW7bHWe7iFQ6J64+mkqFdao1KyNak9jw72MuCbeC4RXbMIBr5ikraUk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=OaQQHcLl; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=4jRlBDX4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="OaQQHcLl"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="4jRlBDX4" Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:30:26 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1768840227; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tg4r0hM12VEhzCtDP5l/YG0RGcFgSHWev83wn8qRALQ=; b=OaQQHcLlxOmdqZfs1sXIjPA/cpZeHHx2LVLWa4BHY78rEH66NdRzwSNUXjLoyH/wuNW6G5 h9AfkNspt2tPmxsXmaaTm2LESMDQx25UIWXr4UDoSV+c3N6Sn7PEhnasGHd5www+r/+jOv hlphdtbW+3yGyDIuEhnANPXevrhSTpX8oskGstD7ePtWSU9meJQFf2nIhfnmOIO9GC4o/z BUkW0/WFO0iFSywaz/MWJ2IRIsuPizlZRtP7BFy5mw2gZLl3/D1QZyBcZcI+trvK3LoH31 LmthDXbjrW0rESdyKjp+DJOYgpFk0/rSjMmKjpJE/T/8J20CHKquk775JDbBbg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1768840227; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tg4r0hM12VEhzCtDP5l/YG0RGcFgSHWev83wn8qRALQ=; b=4jRlBDX4Os2TuTfYy8/9OET2fehGZJ9VPIwMUpnLH9boySdmpNXhDgs9HMABNtal+PtFOH sgvjVSvusMR4YsBQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: wen.yang@linux.dev, Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 3/3] net: Allow to use SMP threads for backlog NAPI. Message-ID: <20260119163026.aA1PeSmP@linutronix.de> References: <997bc0de4746100bb69e1bd2ccfb25315d8f62e4.1768751557.git.wen.yang@linux.dev> <20260119082534.1f705011@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260119082534.1f705011@kernel.org> On 2026-01-19 08:25:34 [-0800], Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:15:46 +0800 wen.yang@linux.dev wrote: > > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > > > commit dad6b97702639fba27a2bd3e986982ad6f0db3a7 upstream. > > > > Backlog NAPI is a per-CPU NAPI struct only (with no device behind it) > > used by drivers which don't do NAPI them self, RPS and parts of the > > stack which need to avoid recursive deadlocks while processing a packet. > > This is a rather large change to backport into LTS. I agree. While I saw these patches flying by, I don't remember a mail where it was justified why it was needed. Did I miss it? Sebastian