From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
wen.yang@linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 3/3] net: Allow to use SMP threads for backlog NAPI.
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 11:38:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260120103833.4kssDD1Y@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026012039-shuffle-apple-43ec@gregkh>
On 2026-01-20 10:21:58 [+0100], Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Please see patch 0/3 in this series:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1768751557.git.wen.yang@linux.dev/
> >
> > The reasoning why this is needed is due to PREEMPT_RT. This targets v6.6
> > and PREEMPT_RT is officially supported upstream since v6.12. For v6.6
> > you still need the out-of-tree patch. This means not only select the
> > Kconfig symbol but also a bit futex, ptrace or printk. This queue does
> > not include the three patches here but has another workaround having
> > more or less the same effect.
> >
> > If this is needed only for PREEMPT_RT's sake I would suggest to route it
> > via the stable-rt instead and replace what is currently there.
>
> It's already merged, should this be reverted? I forgot RT was only for
> 6.12 and newer, sorry.
Jakub doesn't seem to be thrilled about this backport and I don't see a
requirement for it. Based on this yes, please revert it.
If Wen wants this still to happen he should either provide better
reasoning why this is needed based on the latest stable v6.6 as-is or
ask stable-rt team to take this instead the current workaround.
> greg k-h
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-18 16:15 [PATCH 6.6 0/3] net: Backlog NAPI threading for PREEMPT_RT wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:15 ` [PATCH 6.6 1/3] net: napi_schedule_rps() cleanup wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:17 ` [PATCH 6.1 " wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:28 ` wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:15 ` [PATCH 6.6 2/3] net: Remove conditional threaded-NAPI wakeup based on task state wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:17 ` [PATCH 6.1 " wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:28 ` wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:15 ` [PATCH 6.6 3/3] net: Allow to use SMP threads for backlog NAPI wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:17 ` [PATCH 6.1 " wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:28 ` wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:31 ` wen.yang
2026-01-19 16:25 ` [PATCH 6.6 " Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-19 16:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-01-20 6:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-01-20 8:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-01-20 9:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-01-20 10:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-02-04 13:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-02-07 20:26 ` Wen Yang
2026-01-18 16:17 ` [PATCH 6.1 0/3] net: Backlog NAPI threading for PREEMPT_RT wen.yang
2026-01-18 16:28 ` wen.yang
2026-01-18 17:02 ` [PATCH 6.6 " Wen Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260120103833.4kssDD1Y@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome