From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62AD121018A; Sun, 25 Jan 2026 16:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769358197; cv=none; b=U+xExA3O2iwG9tiOS0f9/DoY18jnEt//OwI3l4KYOfdTWuVECxJMYGF2clG6tdo6jOBMKaSAjwakZJlc33TJfepWnhmCcJpMGigHDjM+YQJ204LMRZLYhS+0DM+z62uHlBsQ3sAC2NZyRhsdXX67SUJBvr+qx3BqqVcmS4VVz7A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769358197; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q+C3PlAHFFClJm32UkwPQpUTYsed3vglsbB5dFYDyRs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jj0F30Jc/+HrTdFHaGa54kuL3vtn+puZAGpBjPwSbTGTVeo5coT+Dz4/AKnYMIEFwbQhTqQYDwWDkITtpHT3Pa/NzPDyTBkVEa6awqXeoeMwhj7FcFVWTm7scl3YfJ8oE+EKPkCqr6izbaCMEx+pa8Oj0xwe1fu34VO/AaAVhqM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dNm+x/Cs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dNm+x/Cs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769358197; x=1800894197; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Q+C3PlAHFFClJm32UkwPQpUTYsed3vglsbB5dFYDyRs=; b=dNm+x/Cs+Am3DUCamFiuMVJifM+DPqHxrN9iOjB2jO/ggYqUKUnrQuDh 6sjPgEI5H1AKCyDaWt8p3P9wqAnFvIP65FLtHSCP7qUBQmCB0deLiaPzk ujmQfyYfQoXVc2B0fyhiuDwgnmziyPmYuC3BL5NkJ3/9YHNZ+YLFaV9FV 5Ktk644qm9kK+dgUoWRmXuWZ+GEp+2eOZPJ9iXYsvwmIKVaimeJ+HzzeI ReDmjzmEM9HNRGHoryO9IXgagFKkfohyl29lB4vMSwqe+ofeK94FMBU48 nQ9XRm0NG1O374tSQR41H82rUmykfVmnJevoPiDTEBkaI0xFsUAGEIuY2 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BjHZMqhgSCOby/u3yHSE8w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6Phhh9RHQIWlx7teFmav2Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11682"; a="81180954" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,253,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="81180954" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jan 2026 08:23:16 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 16wwdm3mQgyBkh2BeM+bEg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SlVq3XsoS6CgXeqEGfs4hQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,253,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="211947092" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2026 08:23:13 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vk2tK-00000000WBG-3BZ1; Sun, 25 Jan 2026 16:23:10 +0000 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:22:15 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Dorjoy Chowdhury , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, jlayton@kernel.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com, alex.aring@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] open: new O_REGULAR flag support Message-ID: <202601260042.TRDQjGeu-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260125141518.59493-2-dorjoychy111@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260125141518.59493-2-dorjoychy111@gmail.com> Hi Dorjoy, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [also build test ERROR on shuah-kselftest/next shuah-kselftest/fixes linus/master arnd-asm-generic/master v6.19-rc6 next-20260123] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dorjoy-Chowdhury/open-new-O_REGULAR-flag-support/20260125-221826 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260125141518.59493-2-dorjoychy111%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] open: new O_REGULAR flag support config: alpha-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260126/202601260042.TRDQjGeu-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260126/202601260042.TRDQjGeu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601260042.TRDQjGeu-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from : fs/fcntl.c: In function 'fcntl_init': >> include/linux/compiler_types.h:631:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_389' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: 21 - 1 != HWEIGHT32( (VALID_OPEN_FLAGS & ~(O_NONBLOCK | O_NDELAY)) | __FMODE_EXEC) 631 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^ include/linux/compiler_types.h:612:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert' 612 | prefix ## suffix(); \ | ^~~~~~ include/linux/compiler_types.h:631:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert' 631 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert' 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' 50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/fcntl.c:1172:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON' 1172 | BUILD_BUG_ON(21 - 1 /* for O_RDONLY being 0 */ != | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/__compiletime_assert_389 +631 include/linux/compiler_types.h eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 617 eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 618 #define _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) \ eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 619 __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 620 eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 621 /** eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 622 * compiletime_assert - break build and emit msg if condition is false eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 623 * @condition: a compile-time constant condition to check eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 624 * @msg: a message to emit if condition is false eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 625 * eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 626 * In tradition of POSIX assert, this macro will break the build if the eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 627 * supplied condition is *false*, emitting the supplied error message if the eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 628 * compiler has support to do so. eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 629 */ eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 630 #define compiletime_assert(condition, msg) \ eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 @631 _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 632 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki