From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sg-1-100.ptr.blmpb.com (sg-1-100.ptr.blmpb.com [118.26.132.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE8845C0B for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 02:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=118.26.132.100 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769481153; cv=none; b=ORQwy6Ddo8lCvozbUMhDQVdV1qQIHHwZM+BKJN1eqqwS6DcxdhUggBHHuSwcWHS1a8wdM0NOqjzjE5Jdr/RFVYjTkoHNuvMPIzi1jg21J6twGIyHEo6PHLOeuB/f7sUpFQ6/ZXf6AiwR2JmUix4ww31Q1wIct4yA7XVZbI8sYcQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769481153; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uwe6kN8WyqfY+UBMAwf/uEQNhgHeRnjqiRrg2YMQohk=; h=Cc:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:From; b=Ixo6vmvhfok5JoQzDGOufFDoNHudZu+eid0+uwIofQI3Vo1cOKoMp9tsGHlT9zLgM2dLTHwxf38hBfavptUXWWRQij5IOnr1ssYmxvrETvfZh2DoBEnBI/XtI3hAFBSWmJZ47kLHjFZ4kKVhikgIiPdYJRtgnPR4oIfP6JZ4SyE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bytedance.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bytedance.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.b=QyHPlTdz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=118.26.132.100 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bytedance.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bytedance.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.b="QyHPlTdz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2212171451; d=bytedance.com; t=1769481138; h=from:subject: mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:reply-to:content-type: mime-version:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=rLWtDbnQEeUqZTKUmguPf1NnWTuVB8OyE9HkcanCCXw=; b=QyHPlTdzmYmP7R7WlBv5LcPQR+NM6UgYcXe739paexp5LWb8iFFDZa/vp4pPADizcKow2l 76aBCVZgnU53R2e+xh/UnVJNlYjeFue42a1U5mhvlr7AImgbkIg0OctBMMrAtknISYELKY VqBeQkfAyyK7yMg/Ogu1ma4HOpPuxJNMMfgX+TPzs7Pip8T4LUrbxYQb8pFHzcoYRLsHBu 8tM7oQTh5/8EYN2a4Rt1dpZf7Ss2gBwxtpQwuKjEpoW9JsQL+1gW0PfVkghVx4CTU3Dwyf M2MF1oJt3huv7hyDJMhVmejPB9u7IOKK2SGyG8R/5rNnPjB/6RM5rlAo/+l4IQ== Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:32:00 +0800 Message-Id: <20260127023200.414-1-guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-From: Jinhui Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add NUMA-node-aware synchronous probing to driver core X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 To: References: <20260126091749.307-1-guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com> X-Lms-Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20260126091749.307-1-guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: "Jinhui Guo" On Mon Jan 26, 2026 17:17:49 -0800, Jinhui Guo wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thank you for your time, and apologies for the delayed reply. > > I understand your concerns about stability and hope for better PCI regression > handling. However, I believe introducing NUMA-node awareness to the driver > core's asynchronous probe path is the better solution: "asynchronous probe path" -> "synchronous probe path" Apologies for the typo. Best Regards, Jinhui