From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Petre Rodan" <petre.rodan@subdimension.ro>,
"Manuel Stahl" <manuel.stahl@iis.fraunhofer.de>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: pressure: hsc030pa: Fix i2c_transfer return value check
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 17:06:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260129170631.34f429f9@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260129150151.127713-2-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 17:01:46 +0200
Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> wrote:
> The i2c_transfer() function returns the number of messages
> successfully transferred. The function sends 1 message but checks
> for ret == 2, which can never be true. This causes the function to
> always return an error (1) instead of success (0).
>
> Fix the check to compare against the actual number of messages sent.
>
> Fixes: 6362d96585e3 ("iio: pressure: driver for Honeywell HSC/SSC series")
> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Not a bug with any impact because the check is on ret < 0
at the caller.
So this commit message needs adjustment to reflect that - little
point in anyone backporting it as a result.
If it were ever other than 1 or zero we'd want to do something subtler and
even though that doesn't happen I'd write the code differently to reflect the different
potential outcomes
> ---
> drivers/iio/pressure/hsc030pa_i2c.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/hsc030pa_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/hsc030pa_i2c.c
> index a34ef4653f34..e780732c7b75 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/hsc030pa_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/hsc030pa_i2c.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static int hsc_i2c_recv(struct hsc_data *data)
>
> ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, &msg, 1);
>
> - return (ret == 2) ? 0 : ret;
> + return (ret == 1) ? 0 : ret;
That is
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (ret != 1)
return -EIO;
return 0;
> }
>
> static int hsc_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-29 15:01 [PATCH] iio: gyro: itg3200: Fix unchecked return value in read_raw Antoniu Miclaus
2026-01-29 15:01 ` [PATCH] iio: pressure: hsc030pa: Fix i2c_transfer return value check Antoniu Miclaus
2026-01-29 15:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-29 17:06 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-01-29 15:53 ` [PATCH] iio: gyro: itg3200: Fix unchecked return value in read_raw Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-29 17:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260129170631.34f429f9@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=antoniu.miclaus@analog.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manuel.stahl@iis.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=petre.rodan@subdimension.ro \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®