mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: nSVM: Do not track EFER.SVME toggling in guest mode
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 02:07:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260130020735.2517101-3-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260130020735.2517101-1-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>

KVM tracks when EFER.SVME is set and cleared to initialize and tear down
nested state. However, it doesn't differentiate if EFER.SVME is getting
toggled in L1 or L2+. Toggling EFER.SVME in L2+ is inconsequential from
KVM's perspective, as the vCPU is still obviously using nested.

This causes a problem if L2 sets then clears EFER.SVME without L1
interception, as KVM exits guest mode and tears down nested state while
L2 is running, executing L1 without injecting a proper #VMEXIT.

Technically, it's not a bug as the APM states that an L1 hypervisor
should intercept EFER writes:

	The effect of turning off EFER.SVME while a guest is running is
	undefined; therefore, the VMM should always prevent guests from
	writing EFER.

However, it would be nice if KVM handled it more gracefully.

Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 4575a6a7d6c4e..eaf0f8053fbfb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -208,6 +208,13 @@ static int svm_set_efer_svme(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 old_efer, u64 new_efer)
 	if ((old_efer & EFER_SVME) == (new_efer & EFER_SVME))
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * An L2 guest setting or clearing EFER_SVME does not change whether or
+	 * not the vCPU can use nested from KVM's perspective.
+	 */
+	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu))
+		return 0;
+
 	if (new_efer & EFER_SVME) {
 		r = svm_allocate_nested(svm);
 		if (r)
-- 
2.53.0.rc1.225.gd81095ad13-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-30  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-30  2:07 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: nSVM: Stop tracking EFER.SVME " Yosry Ahmed
2026-01-30  2:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: SVM: Refactor EFER.SVME switching logic out of svm_set_efer() Yosry Ahmed
2026-02-04 18:49   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-01-30  2:07 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2026-02-04 21:15   ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: nSVM: Do not track EFER.SVME toggling in guest mode Sean Christopherson
2026-02-04 23:30     ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-02-05  2:10       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-01-30  2:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Add a test for L2 toggling EFER.SVME Yosry Ahmed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260130020735.2517101-3-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    --to=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®