From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E56230DEC0; Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769878252; cv=none; b=pxaTn+VOo/bzBRVlOc93NWcVkn41R3I92Kv7xLFADLNRJyCagMeainNqPXt8FD6VPPdlaE+9eky1RwEKx94C2AeEtyKYilBCQ6hc44RZJMilkh4Zfy11ndL3b+jNSL+9ni48VU8R32HGfNlwZCo5RAcF8BVNIWFWZISmwgqgYVU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769878252; c=relaxed/simple; bh=O3q+x+gwQ2TcuZN5vB4aSDUBiDxUNT/auhtstOa4Mlg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MKCiz3jOgxLU4PDnQd/UlX0S3gUcVLLGYiH4gOJBhC/qr7Ryb86xil3AOnygUU6i2pq9qRpRG6ZyaZDZzjySJ2mTYF8AfW8ZZff7pvtFrSH6TCAKCOIgO0UfhG4iey/cixdoMQw7uvgMJdwPeJR4CyZwTEbQD6yOJZKCnOdulOI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=V1LCKBMU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V1LCKBMU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEBE1C16AAE; Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:50:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769878251; bh=O3q+x+gwQ2TcuZN5vB4aSDUBiDxUNT/auhtstOa4Mlg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=V1LCKBMUTtPUsbM4tE9hyIzDNBJMcc9JWDIYITx57VdgWXxyzF+8CDZPxIXXKgDUz h8BvAVW2x6y3SId2Ljsa+v2B+HOqxo8CYKpS7icYaDZNXL958njK7yUiIlI8J/kjQV AO3/5KcMaHcumycrh2iRDhMDCSdR++2+dZ9M7KUQQoX+56D/yMgWpHuSB6h9VkPvTk ALcjTRuT+Qbfr6mVX1UQytrY8FOr8So2xN1G7hRoqujE8bGfIbxyDlr+f8UhXrQwsZ HP9YKNiMnNc/IAaqUNdZVBOYYwT6L2D4Z9P1jLxSwpYxSgUONsqduDrTHCPV4nnWUp FjhQDiTh9mSnQ== Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:50:40 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: "Miclaus, Antoniu" Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Lars-Peter Clausen , "Hennerich, Michael" , David Lechner , "Sa, Nuno" , Andy Shevchenko , Matti Vaittinen , Fabio Estevam , Sakari Ailus , Chen-Yu Tsai , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad4080: remove unused dec_rate field Message-ID: <20260131165040.381d414b@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20260129172340.34216-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.51; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 07:32:58 +0000 "Miclaus, Antoniu" wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andy Shevchenko > > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 7:22 AM > > To: Miclaus, Antoniu > > Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen ; Hennerich, Michael > > ; Jonathan Cameron ; > > David Lechner ; Sa, Nuno ; > > Andy Shevchenko ; Matti Vaittinen > > ; Fabio Estevam ; Sakari > > Ailus ; Chen-Yu Tsai ; linux- > > iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad4080: remove unused dec_rate field > > > > [External] > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 07:21:58PM +0200, Antoniu Miclaus wrote: > > > Remove unused dec_rate field from ad4080_state struct. > > > The driver reads/writes decimation rate directly from > > > hardware registers via ad4080_get_dec_rate() and > > > ad4080_set_dec_rate() functions. > > > > It seems you missed my reply to one of your previous series. > > Do *not* thread emails which are independent! > > Hi, > > I didn't miss your previous email. I checked now the command used for sending the patches and it didn't include the --thread option > > From terminal history: > `git send-email --to-cmd='./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --norolestats iio-unused/000*' iio-unused/000*` Experiment a bit. These are threaded with all the later ones in reply to the first patch. In-Reply-To: <20260129172340.34216-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> is set in the header. As I mentioned in other branch of thread. I'd actually prefer sets of patches doing a similar thing bundled up in a thread with a cover letter and clear patch numbering. That cover letter can provide some brief background info on the common elements of the series. Even if it is trivial it puts a sensible grouping on them and reduces how commands are needed to apply them. Jonathan > > Thanks, > > > Really, you should have something internally at the AD to explain the process > > and the simple things like this. > > > > -- > > With Best Regards, > > Andy Shevchenko > > > >