From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/locking/core] locking/rwlock: Fix write_trylock_irqsave() with CONFIG_INLINE_WRITE_TRYLOCK
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 23:50:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260203225114.3493538-1-elver@google.com> (raw)
Move _raw_write_trylock_irqsave() after the _raw_write_trylock macro to
ensure it uses the inlined version, fixing a linker error when inlining
is enabled. This is the case on s390:
>> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: _raw_write_trylock
>>> referenced by rwlock_api_smp.h:48 (include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:48)
>>> lib/test_context-analysis.o:(test_write_trylock_extra) in archive vmlinux.a
>>> referenced by rwlock_api_smp.h:48 (include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:48)
>>> lib/test_context-analysis.o:(test_write_trylock_extra) in archive vmlinux.a
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602032101.dbxRfsWO-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h
index d903b17c46ca..61a852609eab 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h
@@ -41,16 +41,6 @@ void __lockfunc
_raw_write_unlock_irqrestore(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
__releases(lock);
-static inline bool _raw_write_trylock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags)
- __cond_acquires(true, lock)
-{
- local_irq_save(*flags);
- if (_raw_write_trylock(lock))
- return true;
- local_irq_restore(*flags);
- return false;
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_INLINE_READ_LOCK
#define _raw_read_lock(lock) __raw_read_lock(lock)
#endif
@@ -147,6 +137,16 @@ static inline int __raw_write_trylock(rwlock_t *lock)
return 0;
}
+static inline bool _raw_write_trylock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags)
+ __cond_acquires(true, lock) __no_context_analysis
+{
+ local_irq_save(*flags);
+ if (_raw_write_trylock(lock))
+ return true;
+ local_irq_restore(*flags);
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* If lockdep is enabled then we use the non-preemption spin-ops
* even on CONFIG_PREEMPT, because lockdep assumes that interrupts are
--
2.53.0.rc2.204.g2597b5adb4-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-03 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-03 22:50 Marco Elver [this message]
2026-02-04 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-02-05 8:48 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260203225114.3493538-1-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®