From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289263921DA; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770289703; cv=none; b=dIMUpNRW/5t1oLbt89CitGbsTDmEsVabGjLcf8xy1q4Vm3pABNxOWxaq3kqon1Aj8QCZ/BSmGN+f+wW57Bwa3ATNGaCLzP+dCKTg1jhlNSIBP3myfqX16iO4zbaANI5sHetlAa3Az0Cxr5uoCYKOxstz30lUVLmBnmFP4adDL90= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770289703; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KRr5bjxloleM+AjFGvAP5BAhi15uf5B/cBZt51MJT3o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NbmRd8GuImIxYtidxqm6eAQUmiLjPzXOwWdAscfDOZwjz2EZcHymKHTthTopEYRsShazAKFvoDLdmd0/fcGoWJu8qGuieBumg1gAg/IhnEv+zAYpxJXLXnZfz18mvfjccnpZiNO5zeyUY8dOjPLUddANcDoiFqmgriCjc3LKgg8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jR7ve9k6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jR7ve9k6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFD8EC19423; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:08:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770289702; bh=KRr5bjxloleM+AjFGvAP5BAhi15uf5B/cBZt51MJT3o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jR7ve9k6a0TtuqoQ3bWHXpWD9u+XVhWUBrE56+vmacl1cQVpOJ9GNIOPvskj0RDDh QHcRGtRnXVmUjazf/jtkjGXsznxKSr/IENSXB2B9f+QYfTN5Hbrkz5SR7eVPtxlpEg TBsDErnK8kc1iWdXBFiBQNpylip4bm+nQN0SzX0VxsbAa0ukcNe55c8yHtJy1cVZ8S Hq3OXx7cKJXXAhmJT03KmmWkZKqG5dz9J58RkSIP2N7azfewAZ0ILSRyNNGg8zdnCd UT5YqwNX29RX5pjsqyr66kHnYeYvykyNeRNTTm/1ZACPnubk4U2eQgHrCBYs7hA9JN ZcvHBJoXdZnsA== Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:08:18 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Cristian Marussi Cc: Andre Przywara , Debbie Horsfall , Rob Herring , Sudeep Holla , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Liviu Dudau , Lorenzo Pieralisi , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: zena: Add support for Zena CSS Message-ID: <20260205-intelligent-intrepid-robin-df42bd@sudeepholla> References: <20260123-zena-css-v1-0-34adb95cdf89@arm.com> <20260123-zena-css-v1-2-34adb95cdf89@arm.com> <20260127132206.036892e4@donnerap.manchester.arm.com> <8c343e6d-14f8-4f55-8218-bc3f0813e8cf@arm.com> <20260130-light-piquant-termite-fcbec4@sudeepholla> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 12:11:57PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > All of this madness was the best way I could find to address the problem > of supporting such new unidirectional mailboxes in the SCMI while NOT > breaking backward compatibility in the absence of mandatory naming from > the start. > You can attribute this to my expecting an overly ideal scenario with bidirectional mailbox channels across all platforms using SCMI. At the time, I did not anticipate the range of configurations that rely on unidirectional channels. -- Regards, Sudeep