From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D6292C859; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770287651; cv=none; b=qo2HXhyN7/Dsm/A7AE+Ft56hqOImzRDEKjs3SPh+UZMGmCpAPLPGT/fk9iHoUaaduu14Vtgxjq/oLW4Ous+PMt+77Hq5XeIDqokYOHYEF7FOQowO1NSdVdYDxZvaEFLAM3MnyUyLztiDHJ8PIrV6xvCETQ4c1k2MfnOFhQpahl4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770287651; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cwXSjNmvIUZsjhs6VwwUPithsGWgsk48QoUZLaQvkRI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FGG1+o/3C7kK/rX9kkFsjdiaEs0j4fmpT2gAmA2pbu7f5a7VrMkSl6MsHUYgVetHV3WjLK7JPST01/EB5SjODcccph5Yq5RybOvALb5QnePgpiJkNjPX5U19K5G2dylLiBaTOP4SICbVkpwJ2gly+odGR52Einl8vgCFXoHycys= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jTydPk6h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jTydPk6h" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7306EC4CEF7; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:34:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770287651; bh=cwXSjNmvIUZsjhs6VwwUPithsGWgsk48QoUZLaQvkRI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jTydPk6hucGwsRHGQltqdVNVaGhxmvt2Wt8/jeiaiVNsq5tfpi7HDtBAKUjChxoHi IqKz2f7m29g5O6jHW/ZNN82FRasYYi5P90Rx1dheHO5PnUFCnWITGxrrrcCyAwR2nX AxuIhcinKPdoGrlNCVbUmyKe9vVhPi+dLCOQ2RFIFNZwFJrKgnTS3OzuT+Vnih1SX1 XeYC2kG8xCRl/C3C2pr80o+nVVajtdfVbSxm9/YdJwclB9Dfvkvb7g59w3FkWhrOP2 b629rk5pCNSYStsJ4/3N6+my7J6VD0eIvcGW6A3RbIisX+5YmmGl6P7RoH8YX/qoou 4kyH692fHzALw== Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:34:08 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Sibi Sankar Cc: robh@kernel.org, srini@kernel.org, amahesh@qti.qualcomm.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add Glymur ADSP Message-ID: <20260205-succinct-honest-badger-52e1b7@quoll> References: <20260129001358.770053-1-sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260129001358.770053-2-sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260129001358.770053-2-sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 05:43:54AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: > Document compatible for Qualcomm Glymur ADSP PAS which is fully > compatible with Qualcomm Kaanapali ADSP PAS. > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar > --- > > Changes in v3: > - A few variants of the SoC are expected to run Linux at EL1 hence the > iommus properties are left optional. > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251029-knp-remoteproc-v2-0-6c81993b52ea@oss.qualcomm.com/ > > .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml > index b117c82b057b..fb6e0b4f54e8 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ properties: > - qcom,x1e80100-cdsp-pas > - items: > - enum: > + - qcom,glymur-adsp-pas > - qcom,kaanapali-adsp-pas There is no such hunk... I think this continues my comments from Sep/Oct 2025 that creating such patches, with multiple dependencies makes more difficult to review. I mark it as not applicable, please send when your dependencies hit the tree so I can review it in proper context. Best regards, Krzysztof