From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F335258ECB for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 02:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770257213; cv=none; b=q+eJt8J3UQAZrsOY+7aCQ86UgpJEclDrJRak7Xn77WnKbFCI34kcR8HWeukWOX9j0YarLGptn6d2SnhsdiAGdSpqjipFnSQIUPHEvbG4IMqRr5MMjIInWbm7sVAVvB/kg8MgskVhNI2C47X0xjVnVbo2/ql2LOExMnrC7A5M+Ck= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770257213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eksKR9TjaFf6eviL98fb+Q1N20SxGoF0YE2fLnyRCgc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VuVNmxEoRBO4UKiUSCrpgcd/I+1KSxpOA1tP0VL2HRF8YW7pSGdgbC8y5n3Ca6Hrg3m+QunKpfrh9tPW+IDAw1ptsP3KoiSSApXDaUGVXvV66uqO6dm9ZsPmHbnY9wKlIPtjcLUHwY8SUZZCYmH2cbyn7vcwW/H0eRuFyMw/UeE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=oJ3yfFpM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="oJ3yfFpM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770257213; x=1801793213; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=eksKR9TjaFf6eviL98fb+Q1N20SxGoF0YE2fLnyRCgc=; b=oJ3yfFpMOLHRaO59RLjAwxHOhPx0gGcuQMYF4hgfQgG99Km1DZdWOdEs VCwurbc3FBWIvPVeerrYYLwpUxEhEYGBFiZYAGB/PFCUldC3XMSdjFQgY oOfB+6NYnrrtgVYTj00bvdeQrQ6wn+jaCrYxUDleS4G2bBPypID7jAJGV 944oSynD5Wyig1Lkowby8V48Zms1N847BbOBfLKcmjild/I5G9aRGFgis OLBAcn4yCk5Nz4F+Py9adcCSke+JQaJOa1M3c3lmn3OyKOQWWrRZz37lE LpZYVkezAdY02WGbAtuhhcW9RGWYR55YD85eQVLUDg3r6WCQxcjiJeOPQ g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cDs9VxRAQ3GDEcTmEWm05g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HGk3x5NFTJ2NAHRVfvzb0w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11691"; a="70470504" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,273,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="70470504" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2026 18:06:51 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DkH/glvfQmO5S+olBpvkPg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: V/elJTghR0a3wxjxPjZjVw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,273,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="209708523" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2026 18:06:43 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vnolV-00000000jJe-13i2; Thu, 05 Feb 2026 02:06:41 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:05:59 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Sasha Levin , pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, rppt@kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, pratyush@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com, Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: allow KEXEC_HANDOVER to build with COMPILE_TEST Message-ID: <202602051021.dhUjHKwO-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260204182816.2463931-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260204182816.2463931-1-sashal@kernel.org> Hi Sasha, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v6.19-rc8 next-20260204] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sasha-Levin/kexec-allow-KEXEC_HANDOVER-to-build-with-COMPILE_TEST/20260205-023202 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260204182816.2463931-1-sashal%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH] kexec: allow KEXEC_HANDOVER to build with COMPILE_TEST config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260205/202602051021.dhUjHKwO-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260205/202602051021.dhUjHKwO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602051021.dhUjHKwO-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/memfd_luo.c:316:10: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but the argument has type 'phys_addr_t' (aka 'unsigned int') [-Wformat] 315 | pr_warn_ratelimited("Unable to restore folio at physical address: %llx\n", | ~~~~ | %x 316 | phys); | ^~~~ include/linux/printk.h:722:49: note: expanded from macro 'pr_warn_ratelimited' 722 | printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:706:17: note: expanded from macro 'printk_ratelimited' 706 | printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:512:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk' 512 | #define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) | ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:484:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap' 484 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ~~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~ mm/memfd_luo.c:372:11: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but the argument has type 'phys_addr_t' (aka 'unsigned int') [-Wformat] 371 | pr_err("Unable to restore folio at physical address: %llx\n", | ~~~~ | %x 372 | phys); | ^~~~ include/linux/printk.h:555:33: note: expanded from macro 'pr_err' 555 | printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:512:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk' 512 | #define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) | ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:484:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap' 484 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ~~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~ 2 warnings generated. -- >> kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c:25:10: fatal error: 'asm/early_ioremap.h' file not found 25 | #include | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. -- >> kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover_debugfs.c:99:29: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but the argument has type 'phys_addr_t' (aka 'unsigned int') [-Wformat] 99 | seq_printf(m, "0x%llx\n", kho_scratch[i].addr); | ~~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | %x kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover_debugfs.c:108:29: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but the argument has type 'phys_addr_t' (aka 'unsigned int') [-Wformat] 108 | seq_printf(m, "0x%llx\n", kho_scratch[i].size); | ~~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | %x 2 warnings generated. vim +25 kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c c609c144b0e8db kernel/kexec_handover.c Alexander Graf 2025-05-09 24 c609c144b0e8db kernel/kexec_handover.c Alexander Graf 2025-05-09 @25 #include c609c144b0e8db kernel/kexec_handover.c Alexander Graf 2025-05-09 26 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki