From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185553A6409 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770286879; cv=none; b=obb2LEuy7TzD04RxyJ9d7rVrHmiN/HyRfXx092gr5A1NFS/x+0N/EVvenWe/BYNs1PDlw5BfPEuNRTSgP/3m1kDeeSi+uChZv5EmxzuCLBzkdSVv+lWKufbaKIgAhRxYi8APO3NrE697yldxVk/V8GBbHjt/i1vWWA/rNqiBp1I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770286879; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s66rmDyljRUpgHeZo8YNG8ashNNoPi3vmKFpmLw4EYg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=SXLxsT7v5GS9cnf2Fx+qXZr7tWZAvXquiv7cPi/YXcmYLPDAcYUBuKkJUZjgHgwkxH76VSDO+6hhrJWGiRLyd1w4wlOL2+xLbjVPF3lZP+Qs6+wbCOzEpJeH5aSZ9pR6YkoR5qWkBkQAkUc+As2xxqIJ3xmU4AykigwLicEFfAI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=mMONTHBL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="mMONTHBL" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References; bh=wvN/Ymyn+5bgH7YPDOrvfIdUupQo6Lh6uMPPgNRqGJY=; b=mMONTHBLR9DN2yXaMm9lrTXhZY tIo1ISzR9MzpxhGs3KNPPUyZhk9MqTjHGAemrHe05WguH3RZgmV14sQLtRVpu/8pEJ4baFgQ12/SP gW4Hgkqe+RYJ8vqZI2xITaZRcPCGfTsOsGGjGOZG6YXsUwDgOWaJrGYAPXDTonfFwrg3enGKmsfcw Z+YV4Nw6UCzVhpEBpPomdiKPGqz7Yo3zP8Yl52qxdlaA4wG75fNnn5kQehvU91uU0kBw7TSkTmBrY ZGlv0x7mjamQS1SfFvHkP4pieJW50Ae0SbX1Ul7uCiNNCTiflg0XMr7ftqVyow1vVTtQxO2NfNUmJ V11TUCcw==; Received: from i53875afe.versanet.de ([83.135.90.254] helo=localhost.localdomain) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vnwU5-0075El-6z; Thu, 05 Feb 2026 11:21:13 +0100 From: Heiko Stuebner To: heiko@sntech.de Cc: quentin.schulz@cherry.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Move to gated-fixed-clock for Theobroma/Cherry boards Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:21:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20260205102104.394991-1-heiko@sntech.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Both Tiger and Jaguar currently use a fixed-clock and gpio-gate-clock to model the PCIe clock generator they have. Ever since I wrote the gated-fixed-clock binding + driver, I carry around conversion patches for those boards to use the new binding and describe actual hardware. I submitted different versions in the initial submission of the then still named "clock-generator" binding, but have reworked them now to use the gated-fixed-clock binding that actually landed. Heiko Stuebner (3): arm64: dts: rockchip: use gated-fixed-clock for pcie-refclk on rk3588-jaguar arm64: dts: rockchip: use gated-fixed-clock for pcie-refclk on rk3588-tiger arm64: dts: rockchip: add pinctrl for clk-generator GPIO on rk3588-tiger .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-jaguar.dts | 13 ++++-------- .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) -- 2.47.2