From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com (mail-pl1-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944BF285404 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2026 04:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771044125; cv=none; b=mnvVt6i5CbEV0+n/Zau7OA9i5oyyxKUYyEuxHghQX05euqHIzjd2TmqhmpPzcL4ajMvV61dPViDoglUBD8nE9VSVyUYnN+/D7ZHgUNVRx23/pbsYmBrUXWRRjj6hDGVNlNYcDTx9xxxms90c02MxDwlIkRHJUST//rSLlojJbws= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771044125; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2FB6FNEUmRqEvJrsfcm12S3WiLj52iwiiEsSlithQRk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=jgPZoPkYuEdGgWATBKvRnvQ+kUP2HjgQvxq8ClNXhDwrqIfx6cXXG6L0WgPLhD7+j6AtaggN1UBQscBlMyGVvldmmiWSEaQpI2IgA+1SqGShorIki6l2P8HI2y8s8coYyp2GXZg3JxpxU3ChVeWNhRSDdTa7n3JVqO0kqldk7Lg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=KNRkvvUL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KNRkvvUL" Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2a7a9b8ed69so15059335ad.2 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 20:42:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1771044124; x=1771648924; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hL0biNfu0bCj74/q4qzrxVbBekW/yRDhJUFSh5YAd+U=; b=KNRkvvULkjTsVzyZECuf6zhVJSHXsgb5Ikzr/Nuw9ypDhV+stFMlpqqFQabVn6/D9X +jgFDewJjTZnd2/PR8aS4GyqxufqhMqAFx33H57hEh4lcKAmw6Ow3At9hAKK+bHUT7W7 pCSPCq/PGAxQyqm459LOLHYX8z80+kFJRsLoEB/03gsuKVQM6384z7uEtyf/jEe9KupD HR9JcXW7fCsv7P/J/HysG093vgu/mNwC6HCoBlGUk1jgu5OWkATIAjs1K02g8a3IfzCe +TAxkE81wHrcuQhT0WAHqb7CC85DGSaf4Np4sCMSF+BVbRCD71hPUisYHk3PWQtZuy10 aLNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1771044124; x=1771648924; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=hL0biNfu0bCj74/q4qzrxVbBekW/yRDhJUFSh5YAd+U=; b=fh8+OZVkB96e9P5J0bHPrrDp+KX3m6+tsRz+84vEhiqr/DibJWSuUpGz05hDkpu248 HYdpxxWujsBfdXmlDN5bKf+VpYIh821f+AjYGYWhxmYsn40wqq8pLxgd+7e6H3cV6Rff wjsQ3BVvL3Fh0mz7G95Nhi9b7v2b61iPdxsqTJtXG9UcpSq4i0zUY/rJZbqQxw3zyfHw W46iI9X3xqahpQgdGav2YJXdDE2iHsDVVup7Q66e4s9UKc/DiKaJakQcUaFdMiqs7oe+ eQgF/wVIcns16UcFATv0vYVA9gWt9vHWWJZXfNsihI+nlCfVoW93zeHMe9jEz48f+2dK duJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyrrpH7rTesj3Ez1zdbKMLPYNZ+BB0SU4u8zr9Lhr32UQwn2qSS 5nJ1ksDVWPbUciXSZHe80r+A5H6tSrIFq+rq0KFTcVZWb4uFhM8WLPsc X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aKtVncTzhVFTR3Sh6BhPrUmnTNCHR5KBIE1FigPlThtKElq6VNZT1FwRH4twGy SRZU5qo/yR27uz4mojKDZpkDS4De4bzvDBtv7Tm0GXLNEoo9FgCQS2EJOohM8szAJ/F9l6V0G97 JnqBDrUq0l67S5EYGDU+m3d57NmuetQ/sJlT+x0oTjNwxKHtz0fqP6LsQrF/z6JyORhxkE8yxIX zmBcLfv4JgpxfWNoJ/9QxWSx2YeJGPUZe4HXzoZo/+lFJM70DqeiFVFq96t8c3lXnvJTpXF1mQr 8KT7qAIkLzt6QI0tHcAOdqdbVoydmWnDpaVkxGLXuVM4qKIcUsycHa9okix1jGgnuTaw+0G4zBu zsojZvmNxoEqTUKTfRsSobFwZN7bvmWG4Ia5D5/6oVsXhJ1P+SsecN9HCnmfoP/liUufrjrhJEb 3KOEyx+zjkXw/SD52I64+2milT+VZQduG3DZRHPONvohwmjSMXyySk X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:8cb:b0:2a0:8be7:e3db with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2ab5050a113mr41560675ad.15.1771044123931; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 20:42:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([113.218.252.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2ad1a6fa21dsm7218885ad.12.2026.02.13.20.41.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Feb 2026 20:42:03 -0800 (PST) From: Chengkaitao To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, yangfeng@kylinos.cn, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Kaitao Cheng Subject: [PATCH v7 4/5] bpf: allow using bpf_kptr_xchg even if the MEM_RCU flag is set Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:41:54 +0800 Message-ID: <20260214044155.38820-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Kaitao Cheng For the following scenario: struct tree_node { struct bpf_refcount ref; struct bpf_rb_node node; struct node_data __kptr * node_data; u64 key; }; This means node_data would have the type PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU. When traversing an rbtree using bpf_rbtree_left/right, if we need to use bpf_kptr_xchg to read the __kptr pointer, we still need to follow the remove-read-add sequence. This patch allows us to use bpf_kptr_xchg to directly read the __kptr pointer without any prior operations. Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng Signed-off-by: Feng Yang --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 3536a91ff8c7..5baa12af3a4e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -9320,6 +9320,7 @@ static const struct bpf_reg_types percpu_btf_ptr_types = { PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU, PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | MEM_RCU, PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | PTR_TRUSTED, + PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU, } }; static const struct bpf_reg_types func_ptr_types = { .types = { PTR_TO_FUNC } }; @@ -9491,6 +9492,7 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC: case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | MEM_ALLOC: case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF: + case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU: if (meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_spin_lock && meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock && meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_kptr_xchg) { verifier_bug(env, "unimplemented handling of MEM_ALLOC"); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)