From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB0A536D4EB; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 16:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771344369; cv=none; b=BcTZsTxz3imHDs28Mz2PFtHOH4GddtoxYwA0XQm+Sttu8Ixq2ZJ3a6DBBBx3gS80L9K7RM4lf3Q1tn4iq0mV8BmScv4OcFwLOQda2nL4fyfgl7V14idmP0gVP0IFb2LmEddTIcoM+u9yr3mVtSOnkNEzjaqJarvcqc/sYZXp3Lc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771344369; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WDpzrYyXTW/aR9fbkG2cdvSaVoCpV5uX1W42IerYW5w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gqMXzJgmW9EGSmmi4SGfv2Is/Mc6Vi5q1QBU6Tt7X/ZNg7n6gRT4meQ6dWFwzogzVMQi5m4K8cO16RqdMEemF2LdS/4vxvwhNThtgy9njETk22tmebrZGLaEgohrVYRXr2vVG5nKFqw9/0oXNTuWWxdhwTWRHw/NTpJK/KeM+rg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=D+C1EXLv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="D+C1EXLv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D1C7C4CEF7; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 16:06:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771344369; bh=WDpzrYyXTW/aR9fbkG2cdvSaVoCpV5uX1W42IerYW5w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=D+C1EXLvvd9alWdRDi/ZDSUrq8Msmc7GZ1NrFy15A88TqvJJaKmaNGno3wpMawtxa MioY1rAj24UXe23Qjw7zCzuiRGCyRF5VXPqRP9emrpojt2hxQ666LcRmb+TcVAIarQ L2/dUShoaGIyUDyoGrwEkbdXNN44nhbMFu+PG/6JCfADSlZE59iVDLbIUsd5FTOVKo t99o+xcYM/H2xlBqHw7D+1SS1Z1KXh/j2h+X+hlHMTY8w6RCj3TiRADF3xZ+0AeQU9 vHURkaXim8IibTMeW/Cq3S2qQDiDt+KxcHPfaojBHwCbLZO1iaK3xoVg0lK3AfMeay iFhAJ9gYuexOA== Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:06:08 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Bjorn Helgaas , Krishna Chaitanya Chundru , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Raj Kumar Bhagat , Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/pwrctrl: A couple of fixes Message-ID: <20260217160608.GA3377925@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260217-pwrctrl-fixes-7-0-v1-0-b5671e58934f@oss.qualcomm.com> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 03:48:45PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote: > Hi, > > This series fixes a couple of issues introduced in the recent pwrctrl rework > for v7.0. Both issues are due to some incorrect assumptions on deciding when to > create pwrctrl devices. First issue is due to assuming that all OF graph nodes > require pwrctrl and another one is due to assuming that all PCI child nodes are > PCI devices. > > Both issues are fixed by changing the pwrctrl device creation logic in > pwrctrl/core. > > Testing > ======= > > This series is tested on Lenovo Thinkpad T14s. > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > --- > Manivannan Sadhasivam (2): > PCI/pwrctrl: Ensure that the remote endpoint node parent has the supply requirement > PCI/pwrctrl: Only create pwrctrl device if the device node is of type "pci" > > drivers/pci/pwrctrl/core.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: 1c2b4a4c2bcb950f182eeeb33d94b565607608cf > change-id: 20260217-pwrctrl-fixes-7-0-b90eb30bbfe7 Are these v7.0 material? I assume the pwrctrl changes merged for v7.0 were tested but maybe not on this platform or this DT structure? Is there a functional regression from v6.19 to v7.0 that would justify including these in v7.0?