From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: dsa: sja1105: protect link replay helpers against NULL phylink instance
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:39:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260218163952.angk7v7ubvhnyksj@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZXnIVpaetfHn0Nv@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 04:21:53PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > v1->v2: select option 1 instead of 2
> > >
> > > Given this, I think the paragraph above needs updating.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand what needs updating.
>
> Oh, you rearranged the options, which makes this changelog comment
> wrong. You're still going with option 1, but you've swapped what was
> option 1 and option 2.
>
> So, the changelog comment should be:
>
> v1->v2: implement option 2 in the original submission, swapping their
> order so it becomes option 1.
>
> since "select option 1 instead of 2" is ambiguous (obviously) because
> it doesn't state whether these refer to the initial patch or this
> patch. I assumed they were referring to the options on this patch,
> that the options hadn't changed, and thus "So, I went with option 1"
> was an error.
I didn't rearrange the options... They are still the same in v1 as well.
Why would have Andrew said "I prefer option 1", and you as well?
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/877b4780-9f99-478c-82fa-a32817d72004@lunn.ch/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-18 16:05 Vladimir Oltean
2026-02-18 16:08 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-02-18 16:10 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-02-18 16:21 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-02-18 16:39 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2026-02-18 16:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-02-19 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260218163952.angk7v7ubvhnyksj@skbuf \
--to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®