From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
wangtao554@huawei.com, quzicheng@huawei.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, dsmythies@telus.net,
shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] sched/fair: Fix zero_vruntime tracking
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:58:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260219080624.438854780@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219075840.162631716@infradead.org>
It turns out that zero_vruntime tracking is broken when there is but a single
task running. Current update paths are through __{en,de}queue_entity(), and
when there is but a single task, pick_next_task() will always return that one
task, and put_prev_set_next_task() will end up in neither function.
This can cause entity_key() to grow indefinitely large and cause overflows,
leading to much pain and suffering.
Furtermore, doing update_zero_vruntime() from __{de,en}queue_entity(), which
are called from {set_next,put_prev}_entity() has problems because:
- set_next_entity() calls __dequeue_entity() before it does cfs_rq->curr = se.
This means the avg_vruntime() will see the removal but not current, missing
the entity for accounting.
- put_prev_entity() calls __enqueue_entity() before it does cfs_rq->curr =
NULL. This means the avg_vruntime() will see the addition *and* current,
leading to double accounting.
Both cases are incorrect/inconsistent.
Noting that avg_vruntime is already called on each {en,de}queue, remove the
explicit avg_vruntime() calls (which removes an extra 64bit division for each
{en,de}queue) and have avg_vruntime() update zero_vruntime itself.
Additionally, have the tick call avg_vruntime() -- discarding the result, but
for the side-effect of updating zero_vruntime.
While there, optimize avg_vruntime() by noting that the average of one value is
rather trivial to compute.
Test case:
# taskset -c -p 1 $$
# taskset -c 2 bash -c 'while :; do :; done&'
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/sched/debug | awk '/^cpu#/ {P=0} /^cpu#2,/ {P=1} {if (P) print $0}' | grep -e zero_vruntime -e "^>"
PRE:
.zero_vruntime : 31316.407903
>R bash 487 50787.345112 E 50789.145972 2.800000 50780.298364 16 120 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 /
.zero_vruntime : 382548.253179
>R bash 487 427275.204288 E 427276.003584 2.800000 427268.157540 23 120 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 /
POST:
.zero_vruntime : 17259.709467
>R bash 526 17259.709467 E 17262.509467 2.800000 16915.031624 9 120 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 /
.zero_vruntime : 18702.723356
>R bash 526 18702.723356 E 18705.523356 2.800000 18358.045513 9 120 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 /
Fixes: 79f3f9bedd14 ("sched/eevdf: Fix min_vruntime vs avg_vruntime")
Reported-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: Shubhang Kaushik <shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -589,6 +589,21 @@ static inline bool entity_before(const s
return vruntime_cmp(a->deadline, "<", b->deadline);
}
+/*
+ * Per avg_vruntime() below, cfs_rq::zero_vruntime is only slightly stale
+ * and this value should be no more than two lag bounds. Which puts it in the
+ * general order of:
+ *
+ * (slice + TICK_NSEC) << NICE_0_LOAD_SHIFT
+ *
+ * which is around 44 bits in size (on 64bit); that is 20 for
+ * NICE_0_LOAD_SHIFT, another 20 for NSEC_PER_MSEC and then a handful for
+ * however many msec the actual slice+tick ends up begin.
+ *
+ * (disregarding the actual divide-by-weight part makes for the worst case
+ * weight of 2, which nicely cancels vs the fuzz in zero_vruntime not actually
+ * being the zero-lag point).
+ */
static inline s64 entity_key(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
return vruntime_op(se->vruntime, "-", cfs_rq->zero_vruntime);
@@ -676,39 +691,61 @@ sum_w_vruntime_sub(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq
}
static inline
-void sum_w_vruntime_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, s64 delta)
+void update_zero_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, s64 delta)
{
/*
- * v' = v + d ==> sum_w_vruntime' = sum_runtime - d*sum_weight
+ * v' = v + d ==> sum_w_vruntime' = sum_w_vruntime - d*sum_weight
*/
cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime -= cfs_rq->sum_weight * delta;
+ cfs_rq->zero_vruntime += delta;
}
/*
- * Specifically: avg_runtime() + 0 must result in entity_eligible() := true
+ * Specifically: avg_vruntime() + 0 must result in entity_eligible() := true
* For this to be so, the result of this function must have a left bias.
+ *
+ * Called in:
+ * - place_entity() -- before enqueue
+ * - update_entity_lag() -- before dequeue
+ * - entity_tick()
+ *
+ * This means it is one entry 'behind' but that puts it close enough to where
+ * the bound on entity_key() is at most two lag bounds.
*/
u64 avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
- s64 avg = cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime;
- long load = cfs_rq->sum_weight;
+ long weight = cfs_rq->sum_weight;
+ s64 delta = 0;
- if (curr && curr->on_rq) {
- unsigned long weight = scale_load_down(curr->load.weight);
+ if (curr && !curr->on_rq)
+ curr = NULL;
- avg += entity_key(cfs_rq, curr) * weight;
- load += weight;
- }
+ if (weight) {
+ s64 runtime = cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime;
+
+ if (curr) {
+ unsigned long w = scale_load_down(curr->load.weight);
+
+ runtime += entity_key(cfs_rq, curr) * w;
+ weight += w;
+ }
- if (load) {
/* sign flips effective floor / ceiling */
- if (avg < 0)
- avg -= (load - 1);
- avg = div_s64(avg, load);
+ if (runtime < 0)
+ runtime -= (weight - 1);
+
+ delta = div_s64(runtime, weight);
+ } else if (curr) {
+ /*
+ * When there is but one element, it is the average.
+ */
+ delta = curr->vruntime - cfs_rq->zero_vruntime;
}
- return cfs_rq->zero_vruntime + avg;
+ update_zero_vruntime(cfs_rq, delta);
+
+ return cfs_rq->zero_vruntime;
}
/*
@@ -777,16 +814,6 @@ int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_r
return vruntime_eligible(cfs_rq, se->vruntime);
}
-static void update_zero_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
-{
- u64 vruntime = avg_vruntime(cfs_rq);
- s64 delta = vruntime_op(vruntime, "-", cfs_rq->zero_vruntime);
-
- sum_w_vruntime_update(cfs_rq, delta);
-
- cfs_rq->zero_vruntime = vruntime;
-}
-
static inline u64 cfs_rq_min_slice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
struct sched_entity *root = __pick_root_entity(cfs_rq);
@@ -856,7 +883,6 @@ RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS(static, min_vruntim
static void __enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
sum_w_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se);
- update_zero_vruntime(cfs_rq);
se->min_vruntime = se->vruntime;
se->min_slice = se->slice;
rb_add_augmented_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline,
@@ -868,7 +894,6 @@ static void __dequeue_entity(struct cfs_
rb_erase_augmented_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline,
&min_vruntime_cb);
sum_w_vruntime_sub(cfs_rq, se);
- update_zero_vruntime(cfs_rq);
}
struct sched_entity *__pick_root_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
@@ -5524,6 +5549,11 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struc
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, curr, UPDATE_TG);
update_cfs_group(curr);
+ /*
+ * Pulls along cfs_rq::zero_vruntime.
+ */
+ avg_vruntime(cfs_rq);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK
/*
* queued ticks are scheduled to match the slice, so don't bother
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 7:58 [PATCH v2 0/7] sched: Various reweight_entity() fixes Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-02-23 10:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] sched/fair: Fix zero_vruntime tracking Vincent Guittot
2026-02-23 13:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-02-23 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 8:53 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-02-24 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-28 5:44 ` John Stultz
2026-03-28 17:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-30 17:58 ` John Stultz
2026-03-30 18:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-30 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-30 17:49 ` John Stultz
2026-03-30 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-30 14:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-30 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-30 15:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-30 19:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-31 0:38 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-31 4:58 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-31 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-31 7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-31 8:49 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-31 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-31 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-31 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-31 17:02 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-31 22:40 ` John Stultz
2026-03-30 19:40 ` John Stultz
2026-03-30 19:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-30 21:45 ` John Stultz
2026-02-19 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] sched/fair: Only set slice protection at pick time Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] sched/eevdf: Update se->vprot in reweight_entity() Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] sched/fair: Fix lag clamp Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-23 10:23 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-02-23 10:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-02-19 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] sched/fair: Increase weight bits for avg_vruntime Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-23 10:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-02-23 11:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-23 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-23 13:06 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-03-30 7:55 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-30 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-02 5:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-02 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-02 10:56 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-03 4:02 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-07 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-07 13:42 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Avoid overflow in enqueue_entity() tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-19 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] sched/fair: Revert 6d71a9c61604 ("sched/fair: Fix EEVDF entity placement bug causing scheduling lag") Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-23 10:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-03-24 10:01 ` William Montaz
2026-04-07 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-15 21:10 ` [PATCH 6.18] " John Stultz
2026-08-10 1:44 ` Jose Fernandez
2026-08-10 7:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-10 23:31 ` Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)
2026-08-10 23:38 ` John Stultz
2026-08-10 23:57 ` Sasha Levin
2026-08-11 0:11 ` John Stultz
2026-08-11 18:55 ` Sasha Levin
2026-02-19 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] sched/fair: Use full weight to __calc_delta() Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-23 10:57 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260219080624.438854780@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=quzicheng@huawei.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wangtao554@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®