From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] sunrpc: cache infrastructure scalability improvements
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 07:26:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260220-sunrpc-cache-v1-0-47d04014c245@kernel.org> (raw)
I've been working on trying to retrofit a netlink upcall into the sunrpc
cache infrastructure. While crawling over that code, I noticed that it
relies on both a global spinlock and waitqueue. The first two patches
convert those to be per-cache_detail instead.
The last patch splits up the cache_detail->queue into two lists: one to
hold cache_readers and one for cache_requests. This simplifies the code,
and the new sequence number that helps the readers track position may
help with implementing netlink upcalls.
Please consider these for v7.1.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
Jeff Layton (3):
sunrpc: convert queue_lock from global spinlock to per-cache_detail lock
sunrpc: convert queue_wait from global to per-cache_detail waitqueue
sunrpc: split cache_detail queue into request and reader lists
include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h | 7 +-
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: cca65706e7b428b96c951016fc372cc766b94b71
change-id: 20260220-sunrpc-cache-fe4cd44413d3
Best regards,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-20 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-20 12:26 Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-02-20 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] sunrpc: convert queue_lock from global spinlock to per-cache_detail lock Jeff Layton
2026-02-20 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] sunrpc: convert queue_wait from global to per-cache_detail waitqueue Jeff Layton
2026-02-20 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] sunrpc: split cache_detail queue into request and reader lists Jeff Layton
2026-02-21 22:41 ` NeilBrown
2026-02-23 14:07 ` Jeff Layton
2026-02-20 19:37 ` [PATCH 0/3] sunrpc: cache infrastructure scalability improvements Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260220-sunrpc-cache-v1-0-47d04014c245@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome