From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C9B2D73BE for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 20:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772050779; cv=none; b=XPy4zhHsNw7osUUCPmKARK3v+VyDspKRdM5zZr7EP0vLh/TGXAerq8We1H+8oaurQyNZyexvVHzqfblFYwTlRxcBvD8uu85BNXz1i/urN1Xl8HaDOIBUNvitY8m2ByhHaoAMLhyw7ZL+5tixyJ/HhtPjn3tdPrOUsw2EU0duyvM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772050779; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D0kdRHjdCd5maRr9Nvj8r9oex3El+UzCAG6ewN6xwFg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=uhuL2266KDJ9XpL5VUsBvvuwWsEuPrcYeZ32CfRlmL3NCr12N+KRlt3+oGeUuz94F62MGn159YZnA3twrpK59rmt3eDrv5J0ov6dL07OlJ5Ox4ZvDeJSNB+jR7MyzfiRr8wbJNRFvXbST3XeOUbdWYdnH8kNTVnLwb1XkGBs9sY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD37175A; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 12:19:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from e134344.cambridge.arm.com (e134344.arm.com [10.1.196.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4BC2E3F73B; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 12:19:26 -0800 (PST) From: Ben Horgan To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, babu.moger@amd.com, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, ben.horgan@arm.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com Subject: [PATCH v1 4/4] arm_mpam: resctrl: Use new signature for resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable() Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 20:19:05 +0000 Message-ID: <20260225201905.3568624-5-ben.horgan@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20260225201905.3568624-1-ben.horgan@arm.com> References: <20260225201905.3568624-1-ben.horgan@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Fix MPAM build after change to new version of resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable(). The MPAM driver doesn't support event configuration regardless of whether default or mbm_event counter assignment mode is used and so return false unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan --- This patch is only here in the case it's needed to resolve a merge conflict. --- drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c index 694ea8548a05..afe43034a516 100644 --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ bool resctrl_arch_mon_capable(void) return l3->mon_capable; } -bool resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable(enum resctrl_event_id evt) +bool resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable(enum resctrl_event_id evt, bool assignable) { return false; } -- 2.43.0