From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8672A39526A for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 08:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772095448; cv=none; b=pzcZqm6vJpFxbmnLIAKU3ufJDUpISve9XrKuTvJ95CDConYZj/2XaQ+7k5cqLd829YTb8KT6dOgnphH6EDVvNdJtQc3K2OkwR20f8RwcSZ818OU/hXc6uJs5hyOQBz92J5YYkyYJgXVy0X+xGHTq7k8FRUQ/UnSWQUltf0OhnKI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772095448; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KT+n7lGou2MwWb/kPhjb2wieItjTek3mHY+ZvxMDcs8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=vCE5E53RXXTmcxPHsuAcj0fS8hjBpO0zN5JHQrCqJLslUpG7B+dydFnGS6wTkDLS3fythCxOhH156f4bq8zQWh4D9zr2xZ+Z8a1J/sT4SOy+oi+snhCacmJ7/zZQLPhqUexnlXZl+2mk8yLRMKWK10/K5n0NTMdJcBIvGqMkY5A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Dh3ExGoB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Dh3ExGoB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7792C19422; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 08:44:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772095447; bh=KT+n7lGou2MwWb/kPhjb2wieItjTek3mHY+ZvxMDcs8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Dh3ExGoBaw+jCSb0OM/XWNE+dZiU0bxQ3eM42o13hylnazJYhVxm0pxcAztbnaEsE MIljxm7A6t1Mmco51FTPgUr6KVY4yPpOhNMGzzrQi4piPuy07Ktml9ViXRHsKhG0OC 1yfY3vfol03ILL5nb3zPliJqtZzPcbYcJC4b2Ei531flm13Pk1E+sRw/7Xe1I+YYqI tIdA6ibvAk9btg/Wy8TmqlLFc7FTZmsDAucB5NkIfJA6uCxXtm9at/Yn2JNNBmYbif 8EQQ45AYQmTbdHQw//psdGP58IcONgvXeXIb4P7YkhO4SAVtjlS03L2hubh+X1d5XX t/DoV5iYYa7nA== Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 08:44:03 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Anup Patel Cc: Himanshu Chauhan , Conor Dooley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, shuah@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] riscv: Introduce support for hardware break/watchpoints Message-ID: <20260226-shifty-stingily-acfd81c08fde@spud> References: <20260223044918.1359983-1-himanshu.chauhan@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260223044918.1359983-2-himanshu.chauhan@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260223-mouth-plated-50294c7a6ac0@wendy> <20260224-likewise-rimless-151f6a12b092@wendy> <20260225-compress-moody-400a1e2f46fb@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4uVDXKIANR8kRBf5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --4uVDXKIANR8kRBf5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 11:05:14AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 2:31=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley w= rote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 10:33:27AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 1:33=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 09:30:24AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 3:55=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:19:17AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrot= e: > > > > > > > > > > Did you miss the comment at the end about the remaining TODOs? > > > > > > No. As I mentioned in the cover letter, the ptrace support is not > > > implemented here. I am actively working on it and these are > > > implemented in ptrace work. > > > The test is done using the perf events directly. The second patch in > > > this patch set has the test application. > > > > Then the patchset should still be marked RFC, since it is not finished. >=20 > Wow! let's all of us post only large series (covering multiple features) > which are difficult to review instead of making life easier for reviewers > through incremental series which make gradual progress over-time. Where did I say don't post it? In fact, marking it RFC *requires* posting it. Don't put words in my mouth. --4uVDXKIANR8kRBf5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaaAH0wAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0irUAQD9jzZIENl7Ss7qLQhBYrb+IP2exfxBH958HMUbfJcIPAD/e1PRRrnbojxe gOrCfktdMAf68Wb1V46UylpoPPVoowE= =Wn2B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4uVDXKIANR8kRBf5--