mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rahul Sharma <black.hawk@163.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	Rahul Sharma <black.hawk@163.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y] dm-verity: disable recursive forward error correction
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:35:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260226043500.3945988-1-black.hawk@163.com> (raw)

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit d9f3e47d3fae0c101d9094bc956ed24e7a0ee801 ]

There are two problems with the recursive correction:

1. It may cause denial-of-service. In fec_read_bufs, there is a loop that
has 253 iterations. For each iteration, we may call verity_hash_for_block
recursively. There is a limit of 4 nested recursions - that means that
there may be at most 253^4 (4 billion) iterations. Red Hat QE team
actually created an image that pushes dm-verity to this limit - and this
image just makes the udev-worker process get stuck in the 'D' state.

2. It doesn't work. In fec_read_bufs we store data into the variable
"fio->bufs", but fio bufs is shared between recursive invocations, if
"verity_hash_for_block" invoked correction recursively, it would
overwrite partially filled fio->bufs.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
[ The context change is due to the commit bdf253d580d7
("dm-verity: remove support for asynchronous hashes")
in v6.18 which is irrelevant to the logic of this patch. ]
Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <black.hawk@163.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c | 4 +---
 drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.h | 3 ---
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
index 7d477ff6f26b..c55f454ff979 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
@@ -424,10 +424,8 @@ int verity_fec_decode(struct dm_verity *v, struct dm_verity_io *io,
 	if (!verity_fec_is_enabled(v))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	if (fio->level >= DM_VERITY_FEC_MAX_RECURSION) {
-		DMWARN_LIMIT("%s: FEC: recursion too deep", v->data_dev->name);
+	if (fio->level)
 		return -EIO;
-	}
 
 	fio->level++;
 
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.h b/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.h
index 09123a612953..ec37e607cb3f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.h
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.h
@@ -23,9 +23,6 @@
 #define DM_VERITY_FEC_BUF_MAX \
 	(1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - DM_VERITY_FEC_BUF_RS_BITS))
 
-/* maximum recursion level for verity_fec_decode */
-#define DM_VERITY_FEC_MAX_RECURSION	4
-
 #define DM_VERITY_OPT_FEC_DEV		"use_fec_from_device"
 #define DM_VERITY_OPT_FEC_BLOCKS	"fec_blocks"
 #define DM_VERITY_OPT_FEC_START		"fec_start"
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-02-26  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-26  4:35 Rahul Sharma [this message]
2026-02-26  5:04 ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260226043500.3945988-1-black.hawk@163.com \
    --to=black.hawk@163.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guazhang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®