mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dax/kmem: account for partial dis-contiguous resource upon removal
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 13:23:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260227132356.00005c94@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZ_TlK4r41P0xBDO@aschofie-mobl2.lan>

On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 21:01:08 -0800
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 12:15:16PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > When dev_dax_kmem_probe() partially succeeds (at least one range
> > is mapped) but a subsequent range fails request_mem_region()
> > or add_memory_driver_managed(), the probe silently continues,
> > ultimately returning success, but with the corresponding range
> > resource NULL'ed out.
> > 
> > dev_dax_kmem_remove() iterates over all dax_device ranges regardless
> > of if the underlying resource exists. When remove_memory() is
> > called later, it returns 0 because the memory was never added which
> > causes dev_dax_kmem_remove() to incorrectly assume the (nonexistent)
> > resource can be removed and attempts cleanup on a NULL pointer.  
> 
> Do you have a failure signature w Call Trace to paste here?
> If not, maybe just insert the expected signature for grepping:
> "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference"
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-27 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23 20:15 Davidlohr Bueso
2026-02-26  5:01 ` Alison Schofield
2026-02-27 13:23   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-02-27 19:27   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-03-11 16:53 ` Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260227132356.00005c94@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®