From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D70F42F54F for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 16:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772469812; cv=none; b=kgoEPjOCJdrWAU2bGFi2i576v7hGGi79eEYXVUENJOZBQp7r8RvvIzfoXR/vT9uDNdGwd2ETkSY5deNdo9vhqqhF+cs+AIChO4pRX9D0OM6vRqJyOFYBXdo/x2bbjzNfFX89ULdhn54hnLvCUj9UD0a/VBlw0a4OkwPOoDgaahY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772469812; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CKfD0tEOxwp1HiaYEogOXp+GDN+b/34OmPHGLaqK6KY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iKdgs98lYrkygoOCf+fm9ATvGOR5Lhbc/BqvIVqcz2olFMvMnKzRfx3IRRxgLaDdvZXm4tVlxD2BjuaVBgudlj8PCqolThr+aoYSOrPU0WM13dmhuc6tdKbpaWuiwstdZlSpYXJY6qebfzrLaOuSBjCFoM3+yOHEgbINZotNuQQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=VtYc7Sqs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="VtYc7Sqs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=CKfD0tEOxwp1HiaYEogOXp+GDN+b/34OmPHGLaqK6KY=; b=VtYc7Sqs5nXk+o3f6oHIhC6+FC vGFSg02Y+GCxq41cKr2W6bgytjFHwSiNAGcNsFVVWHsan2nAFhOlfk9jbGJLwhTKj4hYZaLa7VlOF vFwiWEf+BBA2pE9NtEhHv6VDy6vJ+GjXv7ltJOlnYEZJblITELilQBt+gEgrr7AXvk6MRtexS1JRf tQMRFBEMNnyyTS5H+p18kUIJ3aBbCJIegEbyLY0+9xI2qNxKWB3sZNxq5WARy2L/qZO5HfUZXQoZL dzHEtx1OaJlSTMSAF/GKXzsKPE2f05EZJ0xpBE2AXfSX79kid2vtD01dc1kbpusMrTDkhKEX4woO+ 6PVo7GEA==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vx6MZ-00000000cFo-0PR5; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 16:43:19 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DD5BC300B40; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 17:43:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 17:43:17 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Chen, Yu C" Cc: Tim Chen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyle.meyer@hpe.com, vinicius.gomes@intel.com, brgerst@gmail.com, hpa@zytor.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com, patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, russ.anderson@hpe.com, zhao1.liu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] x86/topo: Fix SNC topology mess Message-ID: <20260302164317.GP1282955@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20260226104909.675623579@infradead.org> <20260226105052.737712686@infradead.org> <334d4edb-b8f4-41fb-aa16-6cb7abeaa21d@intel.com> <20260227130130.GD1395266@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <67cfac6fe0495a533fa3204fa01ee07653029e91.camel@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: nt On Sat, Feb 28, 2026 at 03:35:26PM +0800, Chen, Yu C wrote: > Here we check packages0 and 1, should we check all the packages? Might as well I suppose. Could you boot queue/x86/topo on an snc-3 machine to verify it doesn't explode with all the paranoia on?