On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 11:00:40PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> The Rockchip Video Decoder driver expects reg-names to be mandatory for
> RK3576 and RK3588 SoCs, however the binding does not currently require
> the use of them.
> 
> As a consequence, driver would fail to probe with a hypothetical
> devicetree that doesn't provide the reg-names for these SoCs, but which
> is otherwise a perfectly valid DT from the binding perspective.
> 
> Update the binding and make reg-names required for the aforementioned
> SoCs.  While this change introduces an ABI break, the expected impact on
> potential users would be minimal, if any, since the old SoCs are
> unaffected, while the video decoder support for these newer variants in
> mainline driver and devicetrees hasn't been released yet.
> 
> Moreover, this is also a prerequisite for a subsequent binding update
> introducing an alternative reg-names order, according to the
> address-based listing in the vendor's datasheet.
> 
> Reported-by: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260227-urologist-gratitude-7984733f2d41@spud/
> Fixes: c6ffb7e1fb90 ("media: dt-bindings: rockchip: Document RK3588 Video Decoder bindings")
> Fixes: a5c4a6526476 ("media: dt-bindings: rockchip: Add RK3576 Video Decoder bindings")
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>