From: zhidao su <soolaugust@gmail.com>
To: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com,
arighi@nvidia.com, changwoo@igalia.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, zhidao su <suzhidao@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched_ext: Use WRITE_ONCE() for the write side of scx_enable helper pointer
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 18:59:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260306105901.2543743-1-suzhidao@xiaomi.com> (raw)
scx_enable() uses double-checked locking to lazily initialize a static
kthread_worker pointer:
if (!READ_ONCE(helper)) {
mutex_lock(&helper_mutex);
if (!helper) {
helper = kthread_run_worker(0, "scx_enable_helper");
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
plain write -- KCSAN data race
The outer READ_ONCE() annotates the lockless fast-path read, but the
write side uses a plain assignment without the matching WRITE_ONCE().
The KCSAN documentation requires that if one accessor uses READ_ONCE()
or WRITE_ONCE() on a variable to annotate lock-free access, all other
accesses must also use the appropriate accessor. A plain write leaves
the pair incomplete and will trigger KCSAN warnings.
The error path also has the same issue:
helper = NULL;
^^^^^^^^^^
plain write -- KCSAN data race
Fix both plain writes by using WRITE_ONCE() to complete the concurrent
access annotation and make the code KCSAN-clean.
Signed-off-by: zhidao su <suzhidao@xiaomi.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 9a1471ad5ae7..c4ccd685259f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -5355,9 +5355,9 @@ static int scx_enable(struct sched_ext_ops *ops, struct bpf_link *link)
if (!READ_ONCE(helper)) {
mutex_lock(&helper_mutex);
if (!helper) {
- helper = kthread_run_worker(0, "scx_enable_helper");
+ WRITE_ONCE(helper, kthread_run_worker(0, "scx_enable_helper"));
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(helper)) {
- helper = NULL;
+ WRITE_ONCE(helper, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&helper_mutex);
return -ENOMEM;
}
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 10:59 zhidao su [this message]
2026-03-06 14:09 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 14:17 ` [PATCH v2] " zhidao su
2026-03-06 16:34 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 2:46 ` [PATCH v3] " zhidao su
2026-03-09 4:34 ` zhidao su
2026-03-09 16:20 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260306105901.2543743-1-suzhidao@xiaomi.com \
--to=soolaugust@gmail.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=suzhidao@xiaomi.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®