From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>,
Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nilfs2: fix 64-bit division operations in nilfs_bmap_find_target_in_group()
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 07:43:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310-iino-u64-v1-1-18422a053b04@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310-iino-u64-v1-0-18422a053b04@kernel.org>
With the change to make inode->i_ino a u64, the build started failing on
32-bit ARM with:
ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/nilfs2/nilfs2.ko] undefined!
Fix this by using the 64-bit division interfaces in
nilfs_bmap_find_target_in_group().
Fixes: 998a59d371c2 ("treewide: fix missed i_ino format specifier conversions")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603100602.KPxiClIO-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/nilfs2/bmap.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/bmap.c b/fs/nilfs2/bmap.c
index 824f2bd91c167965ec3a660202b6e6c5f1fe007e..4ce9a93149a5af13bc215cc1877a757e2c6cf49b 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/bmap.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/bmap.c
@@ -455,11 +455,14 @@ __u64 nilfs_bmap_find_target_in_group(const struct nilfs_bmap *bmap)
{
struct inode *dat = nilfs_bmap_get_dat(bmap);
unsigned long entries_per_group = nilfs_palloc_entries_per_group(dat);
- unsigned long group = bmap->b_inode->i_ino / entries_per_group;
+ unsigned long group;
+ u32 rem;
+
+ group = div_u64(bmap->b_inode->i_ino, entries_per_group);
+ div_u64_rem(bmap->b_inode->i_ino, NILFS_BMAP_GROUP_DIV, &rem);
return group * entries_per_group +
- (bmap->b_inode->i_ino % NILFS_BMAP_GROUP_DIV) *
- (entries_per_group / NILFS_BMAP_GROUP_DIV);
+ rem * (entries_per_group / NILFS_BMAP_GROUP_DIV);
}
static struct lock_class_key nilfs_bmap_dat_lock_key;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 11:43 [PATCH 0/2] vfs: follow-on fixes for i_ino widening Jeff Layton
2026-03-10 11:43 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-03-10 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] nilfs2: fix 64-bit division operations in nilfs_bmap_find_target_in_group() Ryusuke Konishi
2026-03-10 16:54 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-03-10 17:28 ` Jeff Layton
2026-03-10 11:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] EVM: add comment describing why ino field is still unsigned long Jeff Layton
2026-03-10 16:05 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260310-iino-u64-v1-1-18422a053b04@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®