Rob,

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 11:41:17AM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 15:17:39 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > 
> > On PolarFire SoC there are more GPIO interrupts than there are interrupt
> > lines available on the PLIC, and a runtime configurable mux is used to
> > decide which interrupts are assigned direct connections to the PLIC &
> > which are relegated to sharing a line.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > ---
> >  .../soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-irqmux.yaml  | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../microchip,mpfs-mss-top-sysreg.yaml        |  4 +
> >  2 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-irqmux.yaml
> > 
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

AAAAAAAAA, goddammit. I forgot there was a reason why I had not just
sent off the new version of the series.

> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-irqmux.example.dts:18.33-24.11: Warning (interrupt_provider): /example-0/interrupt-controller@54: '#interrupt-cells' found, but node is not an interrupt provider
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-irqmux.example.dtb: Warning (interrupt_map): Failed prerequisite 'interrupt_provider'

I wanted to ask about this Rob, I wasn't sure I fully understood it.
I figured it was because...


> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-irqmux.example.dtb: interrupt-controller@54 (microchip,mpfs-irqmux): 'interrupt-map' is a required property
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-irqmux.yaml

...I had not added the interrupt-map yet...

> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-irqmux.example.dtb: interrupt-controller@54 (microchip,mpfs-irqmux): 'interrupt-map' is a dependency of 'interrupt-map-mask'
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller.yaml
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-irqmux.example.dtb: interrupt-controller@54 (microchip,mpfs-irqmux): 'anyOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> 	'interrupt-controller' is a required property
> 	'interrupt-map' is a required property
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller.yaml

...so this schema complained. But why is there a custom warning about
"node is not an interrupt provider", when the conditional schema
produces a warning of its own?

> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> 
> See https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/devicetree/patch/20260311-collar-smokiness-5313aa648a6f@spud
> 
> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
> should be noted in *this* patch.
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
> 
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 
> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
>