From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www2881.sakura.ne.jp (www2881.sakura.ne.jp [49.212.198.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1429B3BB40; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 13:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=49.212.198.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773407855; cv=none; b=BoXgc96uu1P8PkbmXlZAFGQwt4vZUmNBhCJxz6UfTlygo8f83mP09LlnhIyyK3eHvNeJFXx5yi2vFVGryGqjnjJInm2KW47mpyoOLDR+dSW/Wi7WjbrE1TrfiYJIl05J5NKJsdVgoaABgHuA7MhmUg5ECzjJLYJcL74Xo3c7Htg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773407855; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PTIXyQyDlwPJ3Xof3a3BmfGAp+M4OPOQDCa2TTf6ZqQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=NvwdKqC/5Sz1CzCNDxucfcqGXYOFnqPfRiPyOpMWJ9xI4d0rs9GergDdS97ZBMKHg5lF7Nx0qyAxj7GODfDgZCY7IT3+tKLzXL4KVZhyJCK+EieC2nbftFAoTbjvSSlmNvAr0L7qhtXDOKwSadd3GYDA568tUKXM8eIaf77Ryo0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=enjuk.jp; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=enjuk.jp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=enjuk.jp header.i=@enjuk.jp header.b=Ij5fSZTR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=49.212.198.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=enjuk.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=enjuk.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=enjuk.jp header.i=@enjuk.jp header.b="Ij5fSZTR" Received: from x1 (198.223.13.160.dy.iij4u.or.jp [160.13.223.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2881.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 62DDGPtG073732 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Mar 2026 22:16:25 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kohei@enjuk.jp) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=PTIXyQyDlwPJ3Xof3a3BmfGAp+M4OPOQDCa2TTf6ZqQ=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=enjuk.jp; h=From:Message-ID:To:Subject:Date; s=rs20251215; t=1773407785; v=1; b=Ij5fSZTRwLdzKF+NYeq9AGJZ93CQ7ZOCv8TrzhFVoqk3XUSd6fsusio7SjKHXVSa 9/KU0soicUNVKtfF2R5e14hUXi54a7wStpQWP59JnYVpEgAE1y7u/SxSLWjMP0X5 FM7k1upwn+1i7QgP/Dd7IIztfvsli21AR5blMvLYawRNIbuxMchdG97rJWMlBnZm 1QYjuoEJ55xp4VBKZm9rEQPjwmljb+xCi2+OtGWzdlWc2MHjuHU6dHrxUnkMAtp7 gOd51uchJIuJ70WdwpkqNISN+HTLGzNhp9rN5/70TVO6wGpjDNlsYRHka0/3NYBs efy6GBIGqipxsOlh73/ZSA== From: Kohei Enju To: technoboy85@gmail.com Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] e1000e: add XDP support Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 22:16:24 +0900 Message-ID: <20260313131624.6562-1-kohei@enjuk.jp> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260312183817.104878-1-teknoraver@meta.com> References: <20260312183817.104878-1-teknoraver@meta.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:38:15 +0100, Matteo Croce wrote: > Add XDP support to e1000e driver. First patch adds basic XDP support, > while the second one adds support for AF_XDP. > Tested on an Intel 82574L Gigabit card. I'd Cc intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org since this series is about e1000e. Is there any reason not to Cc the list?