From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Max Merchel <max.merchel@ew.tq-group.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] pci: imx: Properly support upstream Linux reset-gpios property
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:53:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260313145311.GD502704@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <435e08f1-77fd-476a-96ad-8648ae971e81@ew.tq-group.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3166 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 09:28:23AM +0100, Max Merchel wrote:
>
> On 3/13/26 09:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 13/03/2026 09:12, Max Merchel wrote:
> > > On 3/12/26 20:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > The driver requests explicitly "reset-gpio" property, not the one with
> > > > "gpios" suffix but upstream Linux kernel deprecated it in 2021.
> > > > Existing upstream Linux kernel DTS is being changed to "reset-gpios"
> > > > property, thus update the driver to read that one too.
> > > >
> > > > Note that driver is probably broken already, because it parsed GPIO in
> > > > standard way respecting the flags and on top of that applied the
> > > > "reset-gpio-active-high" flag, thus "reset-gpio ACTIVE_LOW" with the
> > > > "reset-gpio-active-high" property would be double inverted.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20260312-dts-snps-reset-gpios-v2-12-0d5040eb4a1e@oss.qualcomm.com/
> > > > 2. See Linux kernel commit 42694f9f6407 ("dt-bindings: PCI: add snps,dw-pcie.yaml")
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/pcie_imx.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie_imx.c b/drivers/pci/pcie_imx.c
> > > > index 11c4ccbfc555..8d853ecf2c22 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie_imx.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie_imx.c
> > > > @@ -728,15 +728,31 @@ static int imx_pcie_dm_write_config(struct udevice *dev, pci_dev_t bdf,
> > > > static int imx_pcie_dm_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > struct imx_pcie_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_REGULATOR)
> > > > device_get_supply_regulator(dev, "vpcie-supply", &priv->vpcie);
> > > > #endif
> > > > /* if PERST# valid from dt then assert it */
> > > > - gpio_request_by_name(dev, "reset-gpio", 0, &priv->reset_gpio,
> > > > - GPIOD_IS_OUT);
> > > > - priv->reset_active_high = dev_read_bool(dev, "reset-gpio-active-high");
> > > > + ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "reset-gpio", 0, &priv->reset_gpio,
> > > > + GPIOD_IS_OUT);
> > > > + if (!ret) {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Legacy property, invert assert logic based on
> > > > + * reset-gpio-active-high. This won't work if flags are not
> > > > + * matching the reset-gpio-active-high.
> > > > + */
> > > > + priv->reset_active_high = dev_read_bool(dev, "reset-gpio-active-high");
> > > A warning should also be issued when using the deprecated "reset-gpio"
> > > property.
> > >
> > > dev_warn(dev, "reset-gpio property deprecated, use
> > > reset-gpios\n");
> > >
> > Why? What would end user seeing this in their serial console do? The
> > deprecated property is not a mistake, it's just deprecated.
>
> You're right. It's not a message for the end user, but for the developers.
> Therefore, it would be better to add a debug message.
Developers should be enabling OF_UPSTREAM and so that won't have slipped
through?
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 19:26 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-13 8:12 ` Max Merchel
2026-03-13 8:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-13 8:28 ` Max Merchel
2026-03-13 14:53 ` Tom Rini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260313145311.GD502704@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max.merchel@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®