On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 06:10:23PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/03/2026 12:13, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 10:46:06AM +0700, phucduc.bui@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Document the "wakeup-source" property for the ti,tsc2005 touchscreen
> >> controllers to allow the device to wake the system from suspend.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/ti,tsc2005.yaml  | 7 +++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/ti,tsc2005.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/ti,tsc2005.yaml
> >> index 7187c390b2f5..c0aae044d7d4 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/ti,tsc2005.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/ti,tsc2005.yaml
> >> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ properties:
> >>    touchscreen-size-x: true
> >>    touchscreen-size-y: true
> >>  
> >> +  wakeup-source:
> >> +    type: boolean
> > 
> > wakeup-source: true
> 
> I am not so sure.
> 
> The property is multi-type, so we want to choose one - bool, IMO,
> because device cannot wakeup the specific system idle states. Or am I
> misinterpreting the phandles behind wakeup-source and every device can
> be differently routed in such system?

I checked before my original comment, and there there's a bout a 2:1
ratio of defined v true. I suppose my comment can be ignored, I am just
used to this always being true.