From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7389232BF42 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2026 13:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774185956; cv=none; b=OSYWcBhkrtH8tUVOf51w7WijFy59xnMVZh7viSMg0/yrcFyLlxLLK+lsfxGfOLG2XZgIfNDy9LuamdfuWRuMD2NRk6RP7QEo/gx4jUIY6PHoqO6jFzYcZXjSs8NLr1tZrnOlx3g5YNJ5lZUVquemz85LpwzqAsjDZ4QBBe2IaEg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774185956; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tXmbjanna8jwNI1OUqxIulxJ1F9340+85/yv+vfrl2w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=s88aqTnvPisFDwqrMs9p9e4xiSAKOQobY/rw8ixUQEndrUBPzzw/iv1ExQ2a8YNj6IrhUCOZpAPQT6MYGUVNnER/JFZoMgUYshxjU3tR73HFjOzGRpxUxWS6xbhJpIqsx/caRVqMw70Zp9jamsdSj90etgTVITA5HHyldhPMWJA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=GYV/qftf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="GYV/qftf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774185954; x=1805721954; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=tXmbjanna8jwNI1OUqxIulxJ1F9340+85/yv+vfrl2w=; b=GYV/qftfwCP5cis4lwxdoflXYYARhOgLLQ2eZafct30TURcIRna/S1cN K30qGzAudwhA5hO79z26VXjFos8z7TaNuff9gFIGuh7mIbKlXa5ADAgQR siWln/od480YND203j3giyoTaiHWRP2stKbmx99BjZP1V128sgIV12JoG 6GofjDOONu2ON91OfrDhZ3Dd6FdoZLbmXPsVrwwIsb+FNjJ7vnrL9Rg0z ifhH1zbeDFEOiKDWGWc/VX32DxMLKrVl7FD8NMG8aYLZ2R3GYMeovRLdL xb6kIMbLkNgK57Uw7sZoixF2DDzO/E1Zo8AyzdDnNbyc9XfCPNTi51b6S A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ULHXhCoWTt+gsWYTBvyVxQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ky1ULeN5Q1Gp7SUCXdFYXw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11737"; a="75088384" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,135,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="75088384" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2026 06:25:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: f30IYCVEQfuVxUMCuiJpfg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 3N59DuJCQ+eUTTnvUhPUsg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,135,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="246798722" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 9958d990ccf2) ([10.211.93.152]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2026 06:25:48 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9958d990ccf2 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w4IoM-000000006Mr-2Eas; Sun, 22 Mar 2026 13:25:46 +0000 Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 14:25:40 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: Brendan Jackman , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , Vlastimil Babka , Suren Baghdasaryan , Johannes Weiner , Zi Yan , Harry Yoo , Hao Li , Christoph Lameter , Roman Gushchin , Uladzislau Rezki Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: Change gfp_t to unsigned long Message-ID: <202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260319-gfp64-v1-5-2c73b8d42b7f@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260319-gfp64-v1-5-2c73b8d42b7f@google.com> Hi Brendan, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 8a30aeb0d1b4e4aaf7f7bae72f20f2ae75385ccb] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Brendan-Jackman/drm-managed-Use-special-gfp_t-format-specifier/20260322-145930 base: 8a30aeb0d1b4e4aaf7f7bae72f20f2ae75385ccb patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319-gfp64-v1-5-2c73b8d42b7f%40google.com patch subject: [PATCH 5/5] mm: Change gfp_t to unsigned long config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-kunit (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260322/202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260322/202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/module.h:23, from lib/test_lockup.c:8: >> lib/test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected ';' before 'long' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:23: note: in definition of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \ | ^~~~ lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:32: error: expected ')' before ',' token 175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \ | ^ include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:39: error: 'param_ops_unsigned' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'param_ops_uint'? 176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call' 305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \ | ^~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe' 176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected '}' before 'long' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call' 305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \ | ^~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe' 176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:11: note: to match this '{' 305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \ | ^ include/linux/moduleparam.h:192:9: note: in expansion of macro '__module_param_call' 192 | __module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, name, ops, arg, perm, -1, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe' 176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- In file included from include/linux/module.h:23, from test_lockup.c:8: test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected ';' before 'long' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:23: note: in definition of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \ | ^~~~ test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:32: error: expected ')' before ',' token 175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \ | ^ include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:39: error: 'param_ops_unsigned' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'param_ops_uint'? 176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call' 305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \ | ^~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe' 176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected '}' before 'long' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call' 305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \ | ^~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe' 176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:11: note: to match this '{' 305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \ | ^ include/linux/moduleparam.h:192:9: note: in expansion of macro '__module_param_call' 192 | __module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, name, ops, arg, perm, -1, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe' 176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe' 149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe' 133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +133 lib/test_lockup.c 131 132 static gfp_t alloc_pages_gfp = GFP_KERNEL; > 133 module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400); 134 MODULE_PARM_DESC(alloc_pages_gfp, "allocate pages with this gfp_mask, default GFP_KERNEL"); 135 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki