mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>,
	Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Wait for dying tasks to leave on rmdir
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:32:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260323113252.xsuwQA3z@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323035806.724798-1-tj@kernel.org>

On 2026-03-22 17:58:06 [-1000], Tejun Heo wrote:
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> @@ -6224,6 +6225,63 @@ static int cgroup_destroy_locked(struct cgroup *cgrp)
…
> +static int cgroup_drain_dying(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> +	__releases(&cgroup_mutex) __acquires(&cgroup_mutex)
> +{
> +	struct css_task_iter it;
> +	struct task_struct *task;
> +	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
> +retry:
> +	if (!cgroup_is_populated(cgrp))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Same iterator as cgroup.threads - if any task is visible, it's busy */
> +	css_task_iter_start(&cgrp->self, 0, &it);
> +	task = css_task_iter_next(&it);
> +	css_task_iter_end(&it);
> +
> +	if (task)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * All remaining tasks are PF_EXITING and will pass through
> +	 * cgroup_task_dead() shortly. Wait for a kick and retry.
> +	 */
> +	prepare_to_wait(&cgrp->dying_populated_waitq, &wait,
> +			TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);

I had to add here
	if (cgroup_is_populated(cgrp))

> +	schedule();

I saw instances on PREEMPT_RT where the above cgroup_is_populated()
reported true due to cgrp->nr_populated_csets = 1, the following
iterator returned NULL but in that time do_cgroup_task_dead() saw no
waiter and continued without a wake_up and then the following schedule()
hung.
There is no serialisation between this wait/ check and latter wake. An
alternative would be to check and prepare_to_wait() under css_set_lock.

> +	finish_wait(&cgrp->dying_populated_waitq, &wait);
> +	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
> +	goto retry;
> +}

Then I added my RCU patch. This led to a problem already during boot up
(didn't manage to get to the test suite).

systemd-1 places modprobe-1044 in a cgroup, then destroys the cgroup.
It hangs in cgroup_drain_dying() because nr_populated_csets is still 1.
modprobe-1044 is still there in Z so the cgroup removal didn't get there
yet. That irq_work was quicker than RCU in this case. This can be
reproduced without RCU by
-       irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&cgrp_dead_tasks_iwork));
+       schedule_delayed_work(this_cpu_ptr(&cgrp_delayed_tasks_iwork), HZ);

So there is always a one second delay. If I give up waiting after 10secs
then it boots eventually and there are no zombies around. The test_core
seems to complete…

Having the irq_work as-is, then the "cgroup_dead()" happens on the HZ
tick. test_core then complains just with
| not ok 7 test_cgcore_populated

everything else passes. With schedule_work() (as in right away) all
tests pass including test_stress.sh

Is there another race lurking?

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-23 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-23  3:58 Tejun Heo
2026-03-23 11:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-03-23 19:55   ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-24  8:21     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260323113252.xsuwQA3z@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=spasswolf@web.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®