mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, tglx@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org,
	anna-maria@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mkchauras@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Micro optimise to get this_cpu once
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 01:06:26 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260323193630.640311-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

It was observed that compiler doesn't optimise this block to hoist
this_cpu calculations out of the loop in preempt disabled sections. 

for_each_cpu(c, mask) {
	if (c == smp_processor_id())
		do_something
	do_something_else
}

smp_processor_id() could be compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y where it
can be used for warnings. So maybe that's one of the reason it can't
optimize. __smp_processor_id is arch specific, that maybe another
reason.

Even on CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=n, compiler didn't optimize it out of the
loop.

find_new_ilb dis-assembly in powerpc(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=n).
c00000000028cc7c:       bl      c000000000a93c98 <_find_next_and_bit>
c00000000028cc80:       nop
c00000000028cc84:       lwz     r5,0(r29)
c00000000028cc88:       extsw   r30,r3  
c00000000028cc8c:       mr      r31,r3  
c00000000028cc90:       mr      r26,r3  
c00000000028cc94:       cmplw   r5,r3   
c00000000028cc98:       mr      r3,r30  
c00000000028cc9c:       ble     c00000000028ccf8 <kick_ilb+0x10c>
c00000000028cca0:       lhz     r9,8(r13)
     #This is where smp_processor_id is fetched i.e within the loop body.
c00000000028cca4:       cmpw    r9,r31  
c00000000028cca8:       beq     c00000000028ccc0 <kick_ilb+0xd4> 
c00000000028ccac:       bl      c0000000002cd938 <idle_cpu+0x8>
c00000000028ccb0:       nop
c00000000028ccb4:       cmpwi   r3,0    
c00000000028ccb8:       bne     c00000000028cd30 <kick_ilb+0x144>

find_new_ilb dis-assembly in x86(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=n).
ffffffff813588eb: 	call   ffffffff81367b30 <housekeeping_cpumask>
ffffffff813588f0: 	xor    %ecx,%ecx
ffffffff813588f2: 	mov    $0xffffffffffffffff,%rsi
ffffffff813588f9: 	mov    %rax,%r8
ffffffff813588fc: 	mov    %rsi,%rdx
ffffffff813588ff: 	mov    0x29258ba(%rip),%rax        # ffffffff83c7e1c0 <nohz>
ffffffff81358906: 	and    (%r8),%rax
ffffffff81358909: 	shl    %cl,%rdx
ffffffff8135890c: 	and    %rdx,%rax
ffffffff8135890f: 	je     ffffffff81358952 <sched_balance_trigger+0x142>
ffffffff81358911: 	tzcnt  %rax,%rbx
ffffffff81358916: 	cmp    $0x3f,%ebx
ffffffff81358919: 	ja     ffffffff81358952 <sched_balance_trigger+0x142>
ffffffff8135891b: 	cmp    %ebx,%gs:0x28e7712(%rip)        # ffffffff83c40034 <cpu_number>
    #This is smp_processor_id() in the loop.
ffffffff81358922: 	mov    %ebx,%edi
ffffffff81358924: 	je     ffffffff81358946 <sched_balance_trigger+0x136>
ffffffff81358926: 	mov    %r8,0x8(%rsp)
ffffffff8135892b: 	mov    %ebx,(%rsp)
ffffffff8135892e: 	call   ffffffff81365140 <idle_cpu>
ffffffff81358933: 	mov    $0xffffffffffffffff,%rsi
ffffffff8135893a: 	mov    (%rsp),%edi
ffffffff8135893d: 	mov    0x8(%rsp),%r8
ffffffff81358942: 	test   %eax,%eax
ffffffff81358944: 	jne    ffffffff813589a4 <sched_balance_trigger+0x194>
ffffffff81358946: 	lea    0x1(%rbx),%ecx

Patched kernel on powerpc find_new_ilb disassembly.
c00000000028cc5c:       08 00 4d a3     lhz     r26,8(r13)
It is fetched once.
...
c00000000028cc94:     bl      c000000000a93cd8 <_find_next_and_bit>
c00000000028cc98:     nop
c00000000028cc9c:     lwz     r5,0(r29)
c00000000028cca0:     extsw   r30,r3
c00000000028cca4:     mr      r31,r3
...
c00000000028cca8:     cmpw    cr7,r26,r3
c00000000028ccb8:     ble     c00000000028cd14 <kick_ilb+0x118>
c00000000028ccbc:     nop
c00000000028ccc0:     beq     cr7,c00000000028ccd8 <kick_ilb+0xdc>
c00000000028ccc4:     bl      c0000000002cd958 <idle_cpu+0x8>


In CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y, if preemption/irq is disabled, then it does
not print any warning.

In CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=n, it doesn't do anything apart from getting
__smp_processor_id.

So with both CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y/n, in preemption disabled section
it is better to cache the value. It could save a few cycles. Though
tiny, repeated in loop could add up to a small value.

This is done only for hotpaths or function which gets called quite often.
It is skipped for init or conditional hotpaths such as tracing/events.

While it was sent out[1] along with other scheduler change, it made more sense
to send it out as separate series after observing a few more falling in
same bucket.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260319065314.343932-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com/


Shrikanth Hegde (4):
  sched/fair: get this cpu once in find_new_ilb
  sched/core: get this cpu once in ttwu_queue_cond
  smp: get this_cpu once in smp_call_function
  timers: Get this_cpu once while clearing idle timer

 kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++--
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++--
 kernel/smp.c        | 4 ++--
 kernel/time/timer.c | 5 +++--
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.3


             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-23 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-23 19:36 Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-03-23 19:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: get this cpu once in find_new_ilb Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-24  9:09   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Get this cpu once in find_new_ilb() tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-23 19:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/core: get this cpu once in ttwu_queue_cond Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-24  5:58   ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-03-24  9:09   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/core: Get this cpu once in ttwu_queue_cond() tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-23 19:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] smp: get this_cpu once in smp_call_function Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-24  6:02   ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-03-26 12:59   ` [tip: smp/core] smp: Get " tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-23 19:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] timers: Get this_cpu once while clearing idle timer Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-24  6:04   ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-03-24 22:27   ` [tip: timers/core] timers: Get this_cpu once while clearing the idle state tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-24  6:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] Micro optimise to get this_cpu once Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260323193630.640311-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkchauras@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome