mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Fix deadlock if uvc_status_stop is called from async_ctrl.work
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 01:52:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260323235245.GB2334070@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316155823.1855434-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev>

Hi Sean,

Thank you for the patch.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 11:58:22AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> If a UVC camera has an asynchronous control, uvc_status_stop may be
> called from async_ctrl.work:
> 
> uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
>     uvc_ctrl_status_event()
>         uvc_ctrl_clear_handle()
> 	    uvc_pm_put()
> 	        uvc_status_put()
> 		    uvc_status_stop()
> 		        cancel_work_sync()
> 
> This will cause a deadlock, since cancel_work_sync will wait for
> uvc_ctrl_status_event_work to complete before returning.
> 
> Fix this by returning early from uvc_status_stop if we are currently in
> the work function. flush_status now remains false until uvc_status_start
> is called again, ensuring that uvc_ctrl_status_event_work won't resubmit
> the URB.
> 
> Fixes: a32d9c41bdb8 ("media: uvcvideo: Make power management granular")
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6733bdfb-3e88-479f-8956-ab09c04c433e@linux.dev/
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Update comments with review feedback
> - Use flush_work instead of cancel_work_sync since the work should never
>   be rescheduled.
> 
>  drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> index 231cfee8e7c2c..ea45b11642e59 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,15 @@ static int uvc_status_start(struct uvc_device *dev, gfp_t flags)
>  	if (!dev->int_urb)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If the work called uvc_status_stop it may still be running. Wait for
> +	 * it to finish before we submit the urb.
> +	 */
> +	flush_work(&dev->async_ctrl.work);

I assume the only way this can happen is for uvc_status_start() to run
after the uvc_status_put() call in

uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
    uvc_ctrl_status_event()
        uvc_ctrl_clear_handle()
	    uvc_pm_put()
	        uvc_status_put()

returns. Is that right ? If so I'd like to capture that better in the
comment, as I have a feeling we'll need to revisit this code at some
point.

	/*
	 * If the previous uvc_status_stop() call was from the async work, the
	 * work may still be running. Wait for it to finish before we submit the
	 * urb.
	 */

And if that's not correct, there's something I don't get and a better
comment is even more important :-)

If the above change is fine, I can update the comment when applying, and

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

This being said, I wonder if we could have a simpler implementation if
we always stopped the work and URB when the last userspace user goes
away, instead of keeping the device active until we get the asynchronous
control notification.

> +
> +	/* Clear the flush status if we were previously stopped. */
> +	smp_store_release(&dev->flush_status, false);
> +
>  	return usb_submit_urb(dev->int_urb, flags);
>  }
>  
> @@ -336,6 +345,15 @@ static void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev)
>  	 */
>  	smp_store_release(&dev->flush_status, true);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If we are called from the event work function, the URB is guaranteed
> +	 * to not be in flight as it has completed and has not been resubmitted.
> +	 * There's no need to cancel the work (which would deadlock), or to kill
> +	 * the URB.
> +	 */
> +	if (current_work() == &w->work)
> +		return;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Cancel any pending asynchronous work. If any status event was queued,
>  	 * process it synchronously.
> @@ -354,15 +372,6 @@ static void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev)
>  	 */
>  	if (cancel_work_sync(&w->work))
>  		uvc_ctrl_status_event(w->chain, w->ctrl, w->data);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * From this point, there are no events on the queue and the status URB
> -	 * is dead. No events will be queued until uvc_status_start() is called.
> -	 * The barrier is needed to make sure that flush_status is visible to
> -	 * uvc_ctrl_status_event_work() when uvc_status_start() will be called
> -	 * again.
> -	 */
> -	smp_store_release(&dev->flush_status, false);
>  }
>  
>  int uvc_status_resume(struct uvc_device *dev)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-23 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16 15:58 Sean Anderson
2026-03-20  9:17 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2026-03-23 23:52 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2026-03-24 17:38   ` Sean Anderson
2026-05-11 13:36     ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260323235245.GB2334070@killaraus.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=hverkuil@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
    --cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®