From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0412623F417; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774447053; cv=none; b=i4WVYOat6zr9G02ElbJJMw5I8IuMhLkXB+x7+9QzeN1Kz8zHnD8Rikw3UEHbsQ5CU+8yHT7GO7cY+PeSuh3IGhlkR3FBO4jKWNujcJmPJ+EgyASTzALYxIEEkS6CqeFGd/0estH3eBLxosp96QFFtsUt5sfBlhKKraKyV0Kj74E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774447053; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nR03rCeox1WQFtX6asW+4qXpDXlOlPtyI2H1ODatRBY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SaomiAvZo/EmaiiKZd5uQpFhYwL//+FvLWDCyv3rpJ8D0QnTPHa6ARaDvEuRv3BMRu9pvC0h3hem/CqrstktDUP26w/d63D4UoYhI9WKKxMS8+hBJ6SbFXiF/5d8t7yOA/+2NbA+zB7coDqBi5+FEyA9bQFs05RaigT8hDv9Nd0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=ttN72k3q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="ttN72k3q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=nR03rCeox1WQFtX6asW+4qXpDXlOlPtyI2H1ODatRBY=; b=ttN72k3qRbVy4+xfcMzcCjipIX D9UzcHQATgEfHQlr458QEL8AmHNte0GpKytEfgo1wCHBvOKh9X7qAuJmMqFMJQmKARPqhK5klduzN njHOfo0MPaY+z3NcMKZ2nnboAfhVqp8bp38+4WEt162/Qj0RCEY0ilrhfXuWGI2tVRrFAvPZrEOsX iFLnAAKxS0NiDuf2DPFVmDfRn3XaEigwQL7o6wLGRg8F33uTm9gjexIIsqNyGNyMFYuowxXSPAWKl oOkf+xgtIz4rBMJyCpkkt/Mvhl2KJEAQgXojum/LQhOmPl66A9vUko0LnwupD1Ahvjjhv/A+d+oTZ 8qTBoRsQ==; Received: from 2001-1c00-8d85-5700-266e-96ff-fe07-7dcc.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl ([2001:1c00:8d85:5700:266e:96ff:fe07:7dcc] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w5OjM-0000000Fwyc-3yuR; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:57:09 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86741300400; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:57:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:57:07 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Qiliang Yuan Cc: Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay , Joel Fernandes , Josh Triplett , Boqun Feng , Uladzislau Rezki , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Zqiang , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Brendan Jackman , Johannes Weiner , Zi Yan , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Ingo Molnar , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] sched/isolation: Support dynamic allocation for housekeeping masks Message-ID: <20260325135707.GZ3738786@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20260325-dhei-v12-final-v1-0-919cca23cadf@gmail.com> <20260325-dhei-v12-final-v1-1-919cca23cadf@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260325-dhei-v12-final-v1-1-919cca23cadf@gmail.com> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 05:09:32PM +0800, Qiliang Yuan wrote: > The existing housekeeping infrastructure uses a single static cpumask > for all isolation types. This prevents independent runtime > reconfiguration of different services (like RCU vs. timers). I think I asked this a while ago; why do we have more than one mask? What is the actual purpose of being able to separate RCU from Timers?