From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 434D0426681 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774546538; cv=none; b=oobCP4/CGyxjCh89nAaolTdwnb4fjZ3ZZkKmsDg34XTQWNL//WwEZ5dngv+kIyjfetj1xOUIkTNiLDMxB9fNfb+Z0220mFOYdWHHgFwZDspGIljTVJbTslW/LnMnAdX3Ls3eqFtubF/xIdM0R5nIFbJoT/eAex17TssKj2SeVvY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774546538; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TyHE5OHGZzs2RnxkcfysEFZpFxuV6TaJanuz3FP869s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=hHWEBEv1tkxUx2wJAmBWgwWTz5BESboZ80dCFlGBFdNzOnD6Prr1RJxP99U8emwb45cP7627GmS4PLWqrTXTQRismNiMymPV+mX+xfGQpfdDknRQ1+3OsbqjrVwNi//un3MIj9vKA1ACemwhg2pRaDx8FHqF6CKABMXBAEWhuFY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=qUachqP8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="qUachqP8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB193C116C6; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:35:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1774546537; bh=TyHE5OHGZzs2RnxkcfysEFZpFxuV6TaJanuz3FP869s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qUachqP8BOzbrgG4HSlaAq5z/goqf36IFKMEuWcVmA/ezszARsNmy+/kABUgsNV3T UYvZwIu1SYn/sbvhKglmJ7PTNodBNVf7gbosR4DzSdtShwsx2qsOd/zoaWbXr96hvs zhjgv0MVqSyjDriEvfH6HaAwBk/PeMlOr5UhfzeY= Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 10:35:35 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Nico Pache Cc: Roman Gushchin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, aarcange@redhat.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, apopple@nvidia.com, baohua@kernel.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, byungchul@sk.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, cl@gentwo.org, corbet@lwn.net, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, david@kernel.org, dev.jain@arm.com, gourry@gourry.net, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, jackmanb@google.com, jack@suse.cz, jannh@google.com, jglisse@google.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, kas@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, peterx@redhat.com, pfalcato@suse.de, rakie.kim@sk.com, raquini@redhat.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, rppt@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shivankg@amd.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com, surenb@google.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, tiwai@suse.de, usamaarif642@gmail.com, vbabka@suse.cz, vishal.moola@gmail.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, will@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, ziy@nvidia.com, zokeefe@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v4 0/5] mm: khugepaged cleanups and mTHP prerequisites Message-Id: <20260326103535.e8f9092bc92a084f0e78ce07@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260325114022.444081-1-npache@redhat.com> <20260325172500.990e240d813a4b2db300e0e9@linux-foundation.org> <87tsu38aig.fsf@linux.dev> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 26 Mar 2026 10:48:13 -0600 Nico Pache wrote: > > It did, but for some reason it failed. > > You can actually see which trees/branches it tried under the Baseline > > section for each patchset. And yes, I need to improve it to log specific > > sha's, not only something like mm/mm-new. Now it's kinda hard to say why > > it failed. > > I dont think this was Sashkio's fault; this doesn't apply cleanly to > anything other than mm-unstable with my patches first reverted. I > first tried an mm-stable base but my code is now dependent on some > code in mm-unstable. As Andrew noted, I should have requested that he > pull the patches from mm-unstable before resending them. Well, you'd be the first person to do this. We're still figuring out how to use this tool, taking it day-by-day. It would be nice for you to have the opportunity - most authors are appreciating the AI checking. It just caused Brendan to describe his own patch as "complete rubbish" ;) But don't bust a gut over this - let's ease into it rather than aiming for some possibly premature step transition.