mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
To: leon.hwang@linux.dev
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, haoluo@google.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, song@kernel.org,
	sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3] bpf: Fix RCU stall in bpf_fd_array_map_clear()
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:20:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331072019.880589-1-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56b3dd26-4110-43c9-8bdb-abc3b7a78435@linux.dev>

On 31/3/26 13:19, Leon Hwang wrote:
> After looking at v2, there's no functional change for v2 -> v3.
>
> I think, you should send a PING in v2 after some days instead of sending
> v3. If v2 will be applied, the tag will be picked up btw.
>
> Besides, change logs are missing here.

You're right, I should have just pinged v2 instead of sending v3.
The only change was fixing a CC typo (eddyz78 -> eddyz87), no
functional change. Apologies for the missing changelog as well.

> Since bpf_fd_array_map_clear() is used across prog_array,
> perf_event_array, cgroup_array, and array_of_map, and this patch aims to
> avoid RCU stalls for prog_array, does this cond_resched() punish
> perf_event_array, cgroup_array, and array_of_map?

map_poke_run is only set in prog_array_map_ops, so the
expensive path (poke_mutex + map_poke_run) in
__fd_array_map_delete_elem() is exclusive to prog_array.
For perf_event_array, cgroup_array, and array_of_map, each
iteration is just xchg + put_ptr, which is lightweight enough
that cond_resched() will not trigger rescheduling in practice.

Thanks,
Sechang

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31  2:30 Sechang Lim
2026-03-31  5:19 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-31  7:20   ` Sechang Lim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260331072019.880589-1-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
    --to=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®