mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: brauner@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] fs: handle potential filesystems which use I_DONTCACHE and drop the lock in ->drop_inode
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 18:08:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331160851.3854954-4-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331160851.3854954-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>

f2fs and ntfs play games where they transitioning the refcount 0->1 and release
the inode spinlock, allowing other threads to grab a ref of their own.

They also return 0 in that case, making this problem harmless.

However, should they start using the I_DONTCACHE machinery down the road
while retaining the above, iput_final() will get a race where it can
proceed to teardown an inode with references.

The easiest way out for the time being is to future-proof it by
predicating caching on the count.

Developing better ->drop_inode semantics and sanitizing all users is
left as en exercise for the reader.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
 fs/inode.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index e397a4b56671..013470e6d144 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1935,20 +1935,29 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
 	else
 		drop = inode_generic_drop(inode);
 
-	if (!drop &&
-	    !(inode_state_read(inode) & I_DONTCACHE) &&
-	    (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) {
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: there are ->drop_inode hooks playing nasty games releasing the
+	 * spinlock and temporarily grabbing refs, in turn opening a possibility
+	 * someone else will sneak in and grab a ref while it happens.
+	 *
+	 * If such a hook returns 0 (== don't drop) it ends being up harmless as long
+	 * as the inode is not marked with I_DONTCACHE. Otherwise we are proceeding
+	 * with teardown despite references being present.
+	 *
+	 * Damage-control the problem by including the count in the decision. However,
+	 * assert no refs showed up if the hook decided to drop the inode.
+	 */
+	if (drop)
+		VFS_BUG_ON_INODE(icount_read(inode) != 0, inode);
+
+	if (unlikely(icount_read(inode) > 0) ||
+	    (!drop && !(inode_state_read(inode) & I_DONTCACHE) &&
+	    (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE))) {
 		__inode_lru_list_add(inode, true);
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Re-check ->i_count in case the ->drop_inode() hooks played games.
-	 * Note we only execute this if the verdict was to drop the inode.
-	 */
-	VFS_BUG_ON_INODE(icount_read(inode) != 0, inode);
-
 	if (drop) {
 		inode_state_set(inode, I_FREEING);
 	} else {
-- 
2.48.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31 16:08 [PATCH v5 0/4] assorted ->i_count changes + extension of lockless handling Mateusz Guzik
2026-03-31 16:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] fs: add icount_read_once() and stop open-coding ->i_count loads Mateusz Guzik
2026-04-01 17:29   ` Jan Kara
2026-03-31 16:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] fs: relocate and tidy up ihold() Mateusz Guzik
2026-04-01 17:28   ` Jan Kara
2026-03-31 16:08 ` Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2026-04-01 17:45   ` [PATCH v5 3/4] fs: handle potential filesystems which use I_DONTCACHE and drop the lock in ->drop_inode Jan Kara
2026-04-01 18:50     ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-04-09 13:40       ` Christian Brauner
2026-04-09 14:55         ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-04-10  9:41           ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-31 16:08 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] fs: allow lockless ->i_count bumps as long as it does not transition 0->1 Mateusz Guzik
2026-04-08 17:01   ` Jan Kara
2026-04-18 12:32     ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-04-20  7:56       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260331160851.3854954-4-mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®