mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
	Felix Abecassis <fabecassis@nvidia.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Reject misfit pulls onto busy SMT siblings on asym-capacity
Date: Fri,  3 Apr 2026 07:31:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403053654.1559142-3-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403053654.1559142-1-arighi@nvidia.com>

When SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY load balancing considers pulling a misfit task,
capacity_of(dst_cpu) can overstate available compute if the SMT sibling
is busy: the core does not deliver its full nominal capacity.

If SMT is active and dst_cpu is not on a fully idle core, skip this
destination so we do not migrate a misfit expecting a capacity upgrade
we cannot actually provide.

No functional changes on systems with only asymmetric CPUs or only SMT.

Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Felix Abecassis <fabecassis@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 7f09191014d18..7bebceb5ed9df 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10607,10 +10607,16 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
 	 * We can use max_capacity here as reduction in capacity on some
 	 * CPUs in the group should either be possible to resolve
 	 * internally or be covered by avg_load imbalance (eventually).
+	 *
+	 * When SMT is active, only pull a misfit to dst_cpu if it is on a
+	 * fully idle core; otherwise the effective capacity of the core is
+	 * reduced and we may not actually provide more capacity than the
+	 * source.
 	 */
 	if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) &&
 	    (sgs->group_type == group_misfit_task) &&
-	    (!capacity_greater(capacity_of(env->dst_cpu), sg->sgc->max_capacity) ||
+	    ((sched_smt_active() && !is_core_idle(env->dst_cpu)) ||
+	     !capacity_greater(capacity_of(env->dst_cpu), sg->sgc->max_capacity) ||
 	     sds->local_stat.group_type != group_has_spare))
 		return false;
 
-- 
2.53.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-03  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-03  5:31 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-03  5:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Prefer fully-idle SMT cores in asym-capacity idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-04-07 11:21   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-18  8:24     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-20  5:49       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-20  8:36         ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-20  9:39           ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-20 21:42             ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-21  9:01               ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-21  9:35                 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-21 11:22                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-21 12:31                     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-21 13:38                     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-22  3:36                       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-22 15:29                         ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-21 12:26                   ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-21 12:33                     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-17  9:39   ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-18  6:02     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-19 10:20       ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-03  5:31 ` Andrea Righi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260403053654.1559142-3-arighi@nvidia.com \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=fabecassis@nvidia.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®