From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from cstnet.cn (smtp21.cstnet.cn [159.226.251.21])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969D82309B2;
	Tue,  7 Apr 2026 02:06:17 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.226.251.21
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1775527580; cv=none; b=Dl+m9N3DcP4bqKnMPfKHgy8IxbV9WXlL3yJV8ct52Y6pp3PQRQ0QYlhaEAjKqYhYOhTfrpHmGK8GoO4T2go8Y74+2GLoUe1uQF4fu+FTbL2gIKImXeuFnPO2MN14QS7Ubbsm7E4yggtwQDn1YTcYlq8ctbOzXroDVaUUVXd9VZo=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1775527580; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=2x0l59Y1plY2Vbw3PvdTdU87pejCKRUqQv/3YHTlCyo=;
	h=From:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=spQnwL+1HOAj75OpxXcMxNuRiwtZf/xUVRuNonLxs0YIw35cgv/1BSwDxm39gwf1YaI4C39tkeJy1FjIiuPZMffjkuEiP0t2ig0ZEKByD2TmbJ74hiz0jRp5ynEjxb20P738WWxtVWTuBDZ4yMBvsAfbnPHAb5jKNERKyFi2XV0=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=iscas.ac.cn; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iscas.ac.cn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.226.251.21
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=iscas.ac.cn
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iscas.ac.cn
Received: from 0003-ceph-reply.eml (unknown [111.196.245.197])
	by APP-01 (Coremail) with SMTP id qwCowABnDGiRZtRpFpx2DA--.27950S2;
	Tue, 07 Apr 2026 10:06:09 +0800 (CST)
From: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 11:30:02 +0800
Message-ID: <20260407113002.3-ceph-reply-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
To: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>, Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: bound encrypted snapshot suffix formatting
In-Reply-To: <20260404101003.3-ceph-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
References: <20260404101003.3-ceph-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CM-TRANSID:qwCowABnDGiRZtRpFpx2DA--.27950S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73
	VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUY77AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E
	6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28Cjx
	kF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8I
	cVCY1x0267AKxVWxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I8E87
	Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE
	6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1Y6r17McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72
	CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IY64vIr41lF7I21c0EjII2zVCS5cI20VAGYxC7MxAI
	w28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAqzxv26xkF7I0En4kS14v26r126r1DMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r
	1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CE
	b7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0x
	vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAI
	cVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2Kf
	nxnUUI43ZEXa7VUb3rc3UUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: pshqw1xhqjqxpvfd2hldfou0/

Hi Slava,

Thanks, you're right.

I have updated this to replace the raw suffix-size constants with a
named maximum, drop the impossible negative snprintf() check, and keep
the NAME_MAX test local to the formatted suffix length. I'll resend it
that way.

Thanks,
Pengpeng