From: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@google.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Invalidate dispatch decisions on CPU affinity changes
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 14:33:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260422142633.G7180@cchengyang.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acHJED4iAeytdC2l@slm.duckdns.org>
Hi Tejun, Andrea, and Kuba
On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 01:13:20PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > The simple way to do this is to do scx_bpf_dsq_insert() at the very beginning,
> > once we know which task we would like to dispatch, and cancel the pending
> > dispatch via scx_bpf_dispatch_cancel() if any of the pre-dispatch checks fail
> > on the BPF side. This way, the "critical section" includes BPF-side checks, and
> > SCX will ignore the dispatch if there was a dequeue/enqueue racing with the
> > critical section.
> >
> > With this solution, we can throw an error if task_can_run_on_remote_rq() is
> > false, because we know that there was no racing cpumask change (if there was,
> > it would have been caught earlier, in finish_dispatch()).
>
> Yeah, I think this makes more sense. qseq is already there to provide
> protection against these events. It's just that the capturing of qseq is too
> late. If insert/cancel is too ugly, we can introduce another kfunc to
> capture the qseq - scx_bpf_dsq_insert_begin() or something like that - and
> stash it in a per-cpu variable. That way, qseq would be cover the "current"
> queued instance and the existing qseq mechanism would be able to reliably
> ignore the ones that lost race to dequeue.
Since this has been stale for a while, I prepared a patch to implement
scx_bpf_dsq_insert_begin() as suggested.
Is anyone else working on this? If not, I'm happy to send the formal
patch to fix this.
--
Cheers,
Cheng-Yang
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 0a53a0dd64bf..0215a21a02db 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -7933,6 +7933,7 @@ static void scx_dsq_insert_commit(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
{
struct scx_dsp_ctx *dspc = &this_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu)->dsp_ctx;
struct task_struct *ddsp_task;
+ unsigned long qseq;
ddsp_task = __this_cpu_read(direct_dispatch_task);
if (ddsp_task) {
@@ -7945,9 +7946,16 @@ static void scx_dsq_insert_commit(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
return;
}
+ if (dspc->insert_begin_valid) {
+ qseq = dspc->insert_begin_qseq;
+ dspc->insert_begin_valid = false;
+ } else {
+ qseq = atomic_long_read(&p->scx.ops_state) & SCX_OPSS_QSEQ_MASK;
+ }
+
dspc->buf[dspc->cursor++] = (struct scx_dsp_buf_ent){
.task = p,
- .qseq = atomic_long_read(&p->scx.ops_state) & SCX_OPSS_QSEQ_MASK,
+ .qseq = qseq,
.dsq_id = dsq_id,
.enq_flags = enq_flags,
};
@@ -7955,6 +7963,39 @@ static void scx_dsq_insert_commit(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
+/**
+ * scx_bpf_dsq_insert_begin - Snapshot qseq before a dispatch decision
+ * @p: task_struct being considered for dispatch
+ * @aux: implicit BPF argument to access bpf_prog_aux hidden from BPF progs
+ *
+ * Capture @p's qseq before the BPF scheduler reads @p's properties (e.g.
+ * cpus_ptr) to make a dispatch decision. The snapshot is used by the
+ * subsequent scx_bpf_dsq_insert() call, extending the race detection window
+ * to cover any BPF-side checks between this call and the insert. If a
+ * concurrent dequeue/re-enqueue races within this window, finish_dispatch()
+ * detects the qseq mismatch and discards the stale dispatch.
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_dsq_insert_begin(struct task_struct *p,
+ const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
+{
+ struct scx_sched *sch;
+ struct scx_dsp_ctx *dspc;
+
+ guard(rcu)();
+
+ sch = scx_prog_sched(aux);
+ if (unlikely(!sch))
+ return;
+
+ if (!scx_kf_allowed(sch, SCX_KF_ENQUEUE | SCX_KF_DISPATCH))
+ return;
+
+ dspc = &this_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu)->dsp_ctx;
+ dspc->insert_begin_qseq = atomic_long_read(&p->scx.ops_state) &
+ SCX_OPSS_QSEQ_MASK;
+ dspc->insert_begin_valid = true;
+}
+
/**
* scx_bpf_dsq_insert - Insert a task into the FIFO queue of a DSQ
* @p: task_struct to insert
@@ -8134,6 +8175,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime(struct task_struct *p, u64 dsq_id,
__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
BTF_KFUNCS_START(scx_kfunc_ids_enqueue_dispatch)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_insert_begin, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_insert, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_insert___v2, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, __scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
index 4a7ffc7f55d2..adc4f1c01b56 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
@@ -989,6 +989,8 @@ struct scx_dsp_ctx {
struct rq *rq;
u32 cursor;
u32 nr_tasks;
+ unsigned long insert_begin_qseq;
+ bool insert_begin_valid;
struct scx_dsp_buf_ent buf[];
};
diff --git a/tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c b/tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c
index 64dd60b3e922..fb68a7d7e201 100644
--- a/tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c
@@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ static bool dispatch_to_cpu(s32 cpu)
* reflect the migration-disabled state yet if
* migrate_disable_switch() hasn't run.
*/
+ scx_bpf_dsq_insert_begin(p);
+
if (!bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr) ||
(is_migration_disabled(p) && scx_bpf_task_cpu(p) != cpu)) {
__sync_fetch_and_add(&nr_mismatches, 1);
--
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 8:35 Andrea Righi
2026-03-19 10:31 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-03-19 13:54 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-03-19 21:09 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-20 9:18 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-03-23 23:13 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-22 6:33 ` Cheng-Yang Chou [this message]
2026-04-22 11:02 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-23 13:32 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-04-26 1:47 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-27 9:06 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-05-01 16:19 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-05-04 8:00 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-05-04 21:24 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-04 21:58 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-05 8:35 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-05-05 8:01 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-05-05 8:31 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-05 9:13 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-05-05 15:14 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-05 15:58 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-03-19 15:18 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-03-19 19:01 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260422142633.G7180@cchengyang.duckdns.org \
--to=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=hodgesd@meta.com \
--cc=jpiecuch@google.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®