From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
Felix Abecassis <fabecassis@nvidia.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Make asym CPU capacity idle rank values self-documenting
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:36:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260423074135.380390-6-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423074135.380390-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Introduce enum asym_fits_state for select_idle_capacity() scan
preferences, instead of using raw constants to improve readability.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6b67049f04c3e..a3ecbed43c34f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7989,6 +7989,22 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
return idle_cpu;
}
+/*
+ * Idle-capacity scan ranks transformed util_fits_cpu() outcomes; lower values
+ * are more preferred (see select_idle_capacity()).
+ */
+enum asym_fits_state {
+ /* In descending order of preference */
+ ASYM_IDLE_CORE_UCLAMP_MISFIT = -4,
+ ASYM_IDLE_CORE_COMPLETE_MISFIT,
+ ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_FITS,
+ ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_UCLAMP_MISFIT,
+ ASYM_IDLE_COMPLETE_MISFIT,
+
+ /* asym_fits_cpu() bias for an idle core. */
+ ASYM_IDLE_CORE_BIAS = -3,
+};
+
/*
* Scan the asym_capacity domain for idle CPUs; pick the first idle one on which
* the task fits. If no CPU is big enough, but there are idle ones, try to
@@ -7999,7 +8015,7 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
{
bool prefers_idle_core = sched_smt_active() && test_idle_cores(target);
unsigned long task_util, util_min, util_max, best_cap = 0;
- int fits, best_fits = 0;
+ int fits, best_fits = ASYM_IDLE_COMPLETE_MISFIT;
int cpu, best_cpu = -1;
struct cpumask *cpus;
int nr = INT_MAX;
@@ -8032,7 +8048,7 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
unsigned long cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu);
/* We have found a good enough target. Just use it. */
- if (--nr <= 0 && best_fits == -4)
+ if (--nr <= 0 && best_fits == ASYM_IDLE_CORE_UCLAMP_MISFIT)
return best_cpu;
if (!choose_idle_cpu(cpu, p))
@@ -8051,25 +8067,28 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
cpu_cap = get_actual_cpu_capacity(cpu);
/*
* fits > 0 implies we are not on a preferred core
- * but the util fits CPU capacity. Set fits to -2 so
- * the effective range becomes [-2, 0] where:
- * 0 - does not fit
- * -1 - fits with the exception of UCLAMP_MIN
- * -2 - fits with the exception of preferred_core
+ * but the util fits CPU capacity. Set fits to ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_FITS
+ * so the effective range becomes
+ * [ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_FITS, ASYM_IDLE_COMPLETE_MISFIT], where:
+ * ASYM_IDLE_COMPLETE_MISFIT - does not fit
+ * ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_UCLAMP_MISFIT - fits with the exception of UCLAMP_MIN
+ * ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_FITS - fits with the exception of preferred_core
*/
else if (fits > 0)
- fits = -2;
+ fits = ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_FITS;
/*
* If we are on a preferred core, translate the range of fits
- * of [-1, 0] to [-4, -3]. This ensures that an idle core
- * is always given priority over (partially) busy core.
+ * of [ASYM_IDLE_THREAD_UCLAMP_MISFIT, ASYM_IDLE_COMPLETE_MISFIT] to
+ * [ASYM_IDLE_CORE_UCLAMP_MISFIT, ASYM_IDLE_CORE_COMPLETE_MISFIT].
+ * This ensures that an idle core is always given priority over
+ * (partially) busy core.
*
* A fully fitting idle core would have returned early and hence
* fits > 0 for preferred_core need not be dealt with.
*/
if (preferred_core)
- fits -= 3;
+ fits += ASYM_IDLE_CORE_BIAS;
/*
* First, select CPU which fits better (lower is more preferred).
@@ -8084,15 +8103,16 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
}
/*
- * A value in the [-4, -3] range means the chosen CPU is in a fully idle
- * SMT core. Values above -3 mean we never ranked such a CPU best.
+ * A value in the [ASYM_IDLE_CORE_UCLAMP_MISFIT, ASYM_IDLE_CORE_BIAS]
+ * range means the chosen CPU is in a fully idle SMT core. Values above
+ * ASYM_IDLE_CORE_BIAS mean we never ranked such a CPU best.
*
* The asym-capacity wakeup path returns from select_idle_sibling()
* after this function and never runs select_idle_cpu(), so the usual
* select_idle_cpu() tail that clears idle cores must live here when the
* idle-core preference did not win.
*/
- if (prefers_idle_core && best_fits > -3)
+ if (prefers_idle_core && best_fits > ASYM_IDLE_CORE_BIAS)
set_idle_cores(target, false);
return best_cpu;
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 7:36 [PATCH v3 0/5] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-23 7:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Attach sched_domain_shared to sd_asym_cpucapacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-24 5:14 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-24 8:46 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-24 11:18 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-24 23:29 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-23 7:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Prefer fully-idle SMT cores in asym-capacity idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-04-24 5:42 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-23 7:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Reject misfit pulls onto busy SMT siblings on asym-capacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-24 5:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-24 9:21 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-23 7:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Add SIS_UTIL support to select_idle_capacity() Andrea Righi
2026-04-24 5:55 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-24 12:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-24 17:13 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-27 5:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-27 8:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-27 16:01 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-27 17:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-23 7:36 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-04-24 4:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Make asym CPU capacity idle rank values self-documenting K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-24 5:19 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-24 12:34 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260423074135.380390-6-arighi@nvidia.com \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=fabecassis@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®