mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/gm12u320: Replace system_long_wq with system_dfl_long_wq
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:15:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430091532.115846-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)

Currently the code enqueue work items using {queue|mod}_delayed_work(),
using system_long_wq. This workqueue should be used when long works are
expected, but it is a per-cpu workqueue.

This is important because queue_delayed_work() queue the work using:

   queue_delayed_work_on(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, ...);

Note that WORK_CPU_UNBOUND = NR_CPUS.

This would end up calling __queue_delayed_work() that does:

    if (housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_TIMER)) {
    //      [....]
    } else {
            if (likely(cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND))
                    add_timer_global(timer);
            else
                    add_timer_on(timer, cpu);
    }

So when cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND the timer is global and is
not using a specific CPU. Later, when __queue_work() is called:

    if (req_cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND) {
            if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
                    cpu = wq_select_unbound_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id());
            else
                    cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
    }

Because the wq is not unbound, it takes the CPU where the timer
fired and enqueue the work on that CPU.
The consequence of all of this is that the work can run anywhere,
depending on where the timer fired.

Recently, a new unbound workqueue specific for long running work has
been added:

    c116737e972e ("workqueue: Add system_dfl_long_wq for long unbound works")

So change system_long_wq with system_dfl_long_wq so that the work may
benefit from scheduler task placement.

Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/gm12u320.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/gm12u320.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/gm12u320.c
index d73dfebb4353..4ad074337af0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/gm12u320.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/gm12u320.c
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static void gm12u320_fb_update_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	 * We must draw a frame every 2s otherwise the projector
 	 * switches back to showing its logo.
 	 */
-	queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &gm12u320->fb_update.work,
+	queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &gm12u320->fb_update.work,
 			   msecs_to_jiffies(IDLE_TIMEOUT));
 
 	return;
@@ -427,7 +427,8 @@ static void gm12u320_fb_mark_dirty(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
 	mutex_unlock(&gm12u320->fb_update.lock);
 
 	if (wakeup)
-		mod_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &gm12u320->fb_update.work, 0);
+		mod_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq,
+				 &gm12u320->fb_update.work, 0);
 
 	if (old_fb)
 		drm_framebuffer_put(old_fb);
-- 
2.53.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-04-30  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-30  9:15 Marco Crivellari [this message]
2026-05-04 13:31 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-05  8:17 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-06-05  8:22   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-05  8:25     ` Marco Crivellari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260430091532.115846-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®