From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tomasz Duszynski" <tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org (open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: chemical: scd30: Replace manual locking with RAII locking
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 15:13:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515151338.74a1ce81@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515002603.19240-1-m32285159@gmail.com>
On Thu, 14 May 2026 19:26:03 -0500
Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com> wrote:
> scd30_core.c currently uses manual mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock()
> calls. Replace them with the newer guard(mutex)() for cleaner RAII
> patterns and to improve maintainability.
>
> In addition, minor refactors in control logic to remove gotos where the
> guard(mutex)() calls would be used, and replace the "?:" operator with
> regular if/else returns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260515002603.19240-1-m32285159%40gmail.com
It caught the main issue. Given that is a fairly common bad pattern
I might have noticed it. But then maybe not. Another win to the bot ;)
> ---
> drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c
> index a665fcb78806..a24c95874fd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c
>
> static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sampling_frequency_available, 0);
> @@ -590,19 +598,16 @@ static irqreturn_t scd30_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> } scan = { };
> int ret;
>
> - mutex_lock(&state->lock);
> + guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
I agree with sashiko here (I might have noticed) that it is in appropriate
to extend the lock scope so far. In particular over the iio_trigger_notify_done().
Depending on exactly what happens in there we might end up with a deadlock.
For this one I'd factor out the reading code and memcpy + lock into a helper
- you can use guard() in that safely without expanding the scope and keep
to the goto pattern for the outer function.
Or just leave this one alone as too complex.
> +
> if (!iio_trigger_using_own(indio_dev))
> ret = scd30_read_poll(state);
> else
> ret = scd30_read_meas(state);
> memcpy(scan.data, state->meas, sizeof(state->meas));
> - mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> -
> - iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(indio_dev, &scan, sizeof(scan),
> - iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
> -out:
> + if (!ret)
Very rarely will I be happy with a change that flips from having the
error path out of line to one where the good path is out of line.
If you do decide to change this one via a helper, keep the goto pattern
for this error handling.
> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(indio_dev, &scan, sizeof(scan),
> + iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
> iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 0:26 Maxwell Doose
2026-05-15 14:13 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-05-15 14:25 ` Maxwell Doose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515151338.74a1ce81@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m32285159@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®