From: "Nikola Z. Ivanov" <zlatistiv@gmail.com>
To: kprateek.nayak@amd.com, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
puwen@hygon.cn, mario.limonciello@amd.com, yazen.ghannam@amd.com,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, me@mixaill.net, kai.huang@intel.com,
i@rong.moe, sohil.mehta@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
xin@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, nikunj@amd.com,
ptesarik@suse.com, nik.borisov@suse.com, darwi@linutronix.de,
suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Nikola Z. Ivanov" <zlatistiv@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/topology: Unify srat_detect_node among amd and hygon
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 19:31:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515163105.414436-1-zlatistiv@gmail.com> (raw)
Since the amd and hygon srat_detect_node implementation
is practically identical the code can be shared.
Move the implementation to common.c
and expose it in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h for code
in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/ to use.
For intel the separate implementation is kept to
stay consistent with its behavior.
Signed-off-by: Nikola Z. Ivanov <zlatistiv@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Abandon the idea for using the same function for intel,
also move the function to another file and limit its scope to x86
https://lore.kernel.org/all/dcfd7282-f722-46ea-b35c-2ab1333ca0d8@gmail.com/
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 74 ------------------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c | 73 -----------------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 4 +-
5 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index 2f8e8ff2d000..f317c6bdcf5d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -277,80 +277,6 @@ static void init_amd_k7(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
#endif
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-/*
- * To workaround broken NUMA config. Read the comment in
- * srat_detect_node().
- */
-static int nearby_node(int apicid)
-{
- int i, node;
-
- for (i = apicid - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- node = __apicid_to_node[i];
- if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && node_online(node))
- return node;
- }
- for (i = apicid + 1; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++) {
- node = __apicid_to_node[i];
- if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && node_online(node))
- return node;
- }
- return first_node(node_online_map); /* Shouldn't happen */
-}
-#endif
-
-static void srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- int node;
- unsigned apicid = c->topo.apicid;
-
- node = numa_cpu_node(cpu);
- if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- node = per_cpu_llc_id(cpu);
-
- /*
- * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a
- * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some
- * IDs of the CPU.
- */
- if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id)
- x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);
-
- if (!node_online(node)) {
- /*
- * Two possibilities here:
- *
- * - The CPU is missing memory and no node was created. In
- * that case try picking one from a nearby CPU.
- *
- * - The APIC IDs differ from the HyperTransport node IDs
- * which the K8 northbridge parsing fills in. Assume
- * they are all increased by a constant offset, but in
- * the same order as the HT nodeids. If that doesn't
- * result in a usable node fall back to the path for the
- * previous case.
- *
- * This workaround operates directly on the mapping between
- * APIC ID and NUMA node, assuming certain relationship
- * between APIC ID, HT node ID and NUMA topology. As going
- * through CPU mapping may alter the outcome, directly
- * access __apicid_to_node[].
- */
- int ht_nodeid = c->topo.initial_apicid;
-
- if (__apicid_to_node[ht_nodeid] != NUMA_NO_NODE)
- node = __apicid_to_node[ht_nodeid];
- /* Pick a nearby node */
- if (!node_online(node))
- node = nearby_node(apicid);
- }
- numa_set_node(cpu, node);
-#endif
-}
-
static void bsp_determine_snp(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index a4268c47f2bc..a0d7c7c47153 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -2518,6 +2518,79 @@ void cpu_init(void)
load_fixmap_gdt(cpu);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+/*
+ * To workaround broken NUMA config. Read the comment in
+ * srat_detect_node().
+ */
+static int nearby_node(int apicid)
+{
+ int i, node;
+
+ for (i = apicid - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ node = __apicid_to_node[i];
+ if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && node_online(node))
+ return node;
+ }
+ for (i = apicid + 1; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++) {
+ node = __apicid_to_node[i];
+ if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && node_online(node))
+ return node;
+ }
+ return first_node(node_online_map); /* Shouldn't happen */
+}
+#endif
+
+void srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ int node;
+ unsigned int apicid = c->topo.apicid;
+
+ node = numa_cpu_node(cpu);
+ if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ node = c->topo.llc_id;
+
+ /*
+ * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a
+ * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some
+ * IDs of the CPU.
+ */
+ if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id)
+ x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);
+
+ if (!node_online(node)) {
+ /*
+ * Two possibilities here:
+ *
+ * - The CPU is missing memory and no node was created. In
+ * that case try picking one from a nearby CPU.
+ *
+ * - The APIC IDs differ from the HyperTransport node IDs.
+ * Assume they are all increased by a constant offset, but
+ * in the same order as the HT nodeids. If that doesn't
+ * result in a usable node fall back to the path for the
+ * previous case.
+ *
+ * This workaround operates directly on the mapping between
+ * APIC ID and NUMA node, assuming certain relationship
+ * between APIC ID, HT node ID and NUMA topology. As going
+ * through CPU mapping may alter the outcome, directly
+ * access __apicid_to_node[].
+ */
+ int ht_nodeid = c->topo.initial_apicid;
+
+ if (__apicid_to_node[ht_nodeid] != NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ node = __apicid_to_node[ht_nodeid];
+ /* Pick a nearby node */
+ if (!node_online(node))
+ node = nearby_node(apicid);
+ }
+ numa_set_node(cpu, node);
+#endif
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING
/**
* store_cpu_caps() - Store a snapshot of CPU capabilities
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
index 5c7a3a71191a..04e73ff9a153 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ extern void check_null_seg_clears_base(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
void cacheinfo_amd_init_llc_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u16 die_id);
void cacheinfo_hygon_init_llc_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
+void srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
#if defined(CONFIG_AMD_NB) && defined(CONFIG_SYSFS)
struct amd_northbridge *amd_init_l3_cache(int index);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c
index 7f95a74e4c65..a33735094843 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c
@@ -20,79 +20,6 @@
#include "cpu.h"
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-/*
- * To workaround broken NUMA config. Read the comment in
- * srat_detect_node().
- */
-static int nearby_node(int apicid)
-{
- int i, node;
-
- for (i = apicid - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- node = __apicid_to_node[i];
- if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && node_online(node))
- return node;
- }
- for (i = apicid + 1; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++) {
- node = __apicid_to_node[i];
- if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && node_online(node))
- return node;
- }
- return first_node(node_online_map); /* Shouldn't happen */
-}
-#endif
-
-static void srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- int node;
- unsigned int apicid = c->topo.apicid;
-
- node = numa_cpu_node(cpu);
- if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- node = c->topo.llc_id;
-
- /*
- * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a
- * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some
- * IDs of the CPU.
- */
- if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id)
- x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);
-
- if (!node_online(node)) {
- /*
- * Two possibilities here:
- *
- * - The CPU is missing memory and no node was created. In
- * that case try picking one from a nearby CPU.
- *
- * - The APIC IDs differ from the HyperTransport node IDs.
- * Assume they are all increased by a constant offset, but
- * in the same order as the HT nodeids. If that doesn't
- * result in a usable node fall back to the path for the
- * previous case.
- *
- * This workaround operates directly on the mapping between
- * APIC ID and NUMA node, assuming certain relationship
- * between APIC ID, HT node ID and NUMA topology. As going
- * through CPU mapping may alter the outcome, directly
- * access __apicid_to_node[].
- */
- int ht_nodeid = c->topo.initial_apicid;
-
- if (__apicid_to_node[ht_nodeid] != NUMA_NO_NODE)
- node = __apicid_to_node[ht_nodeid];
- /* Pick a nearby node */
- if (!node_online(node))
- node = nearby_node(apicid);
- }
- numa_set_node(cpu, node);
-#endif
-}
-
static void bsp_init_hygon(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index f28c0efb7c8f..0c34ec32baec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static void intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
}
#endif
-static void srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+static void srat_detect_node_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
unsigned node;
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PREFER_YMM);
/* Work around errata */
- srat_detect_node(c);
+ srat_detect_node_intel(c);
init_ia32_feat_ctl(c);
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 16:31 Nikola Z. Ivanov [this message]
2026-05-15 19:39 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-05-16 15:10 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515163105.414436-1-zlatistiv@gmail.com \
--to=zlatistiv@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=i@rong.moe \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=me@mixaill.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®