mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2@huawei.com>
To: <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	<vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <bsegall@google.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>,
	<vschneid@redhat.com>, <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC] sched/fair: Introduce half-idle retry mechanism in NI_RANDOM
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 12:43:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518124346.4010277-1-luogengkun2@huawei.com> (raw)

When NI_RANDOM is enabled, some sched domains may be skipped. If the
sched_balance_newidle() fails to pull any tasks, there maybe substantial
amount of idle time.

This patch introduces a "half-idle" retry mechanism to harness the
remaining idle time, safely re-evaluating the domains that were skipped
stochastically in the first round. The retry logic is restricted by
following constraints:

1. Half Idle Time Threshold: Retries are triggered only when the
remaining idle time exceeds avg_idle / 2. This ensure that there is enough
idle time to aborb the retry costs.

2. Dynamic Re-try Window: Instead of setting the half_idle as avg_idle / 2,
initializing it with the remain_idle. When remain_idle is abundant, using
avg_idle / 2 would shrink the window and skip most of domains.

3. LLC Only: This ensures that the newly triggered load balance remain
lightweight.

4. Skipped Domains Only: The retry only re-evaluates domains that were
skipped by NI_RANDOM during the first pass, this is tracked by 'try_bits'.

Additionally, because this is a 'retry' path, the weight is maintained at
1 to ensure long-term balancing accuracy.

Performance Evaluation:
Tested with schbench against v7.1-rc3 baseline, each case was tested 10
times and the average was used.
[schbench]
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
             |        baseline        |  |       compare                 |
loads        |rps(M/s) 99th Wakeup Lat|  |rps(M/s)        99th Wakeup Lat|
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
threads=2    |1.03     7.14           |  |1.05(+1.94%)    7.08 (-0.84%)  |
threads=4    |2.68     7.97           |  |2.82(+5.22%)    7.82 (-1.88%)  |
threads=8    |3.04     12.91          |  |3.23(+6.25%)    12.38 (-4.11%) |
threads=16   |3.06     23.27          |  |3.30(+7.84%)    21.90 (-5.89%) |
threads=32   |2.95     46.50          |  |3.25(+10.17%)   43.28 (-6.92%) |
threads=64   |2.81     94.92          |  |3.14(+11.74%)   88.34 (-6.93%) |
threads=128  |2.71     195.77         |  |2.97(+9.59%)    183.07 (-6.49%)|
threads=256  |2.60     403.34         |  |2.77(+6.54%)    385.30 (-4.47%)|
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 3ebec186f982..5d1c73a41c37 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -13185,6 +13185,7 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu;
 	int continue_balancing = 1;
 	u64 t0, t1, curr_cost = 0;
+	u64 idx, half_idle = 0, try_bits = 0;
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
 	int pulled_task = 0;
 
@@ -13240,18 +13241,28 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	rq_modified_begin(this_rq, &fair_sched_class);
 	raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq);
 
+retry:
+	idx = 0;
 	for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
-		u64 domain_cost;
+		u64 domain_cost, next_cost = curr_cost + sd->max_newidle_lb_cost;
 
-		update_next_balance(sd, &next_balance);
+		if (!half_idle)
+			update_next_balance(sd, &next_balance);
 
-		if (this_rq->avg_idle < curr_cost + sd->max_newidle_lb_cost)
+		if (this_rq->avg_idle < next_cost) {
+			continue_balancing = 0;
 			break;
+		}
+
+		if (try_bits & (1UL << ++idx) ||
+		    (half_idle && (!(sd->flags & SD_SHARE_LLC) || next_cost >= half_idle)))
+			continue;
 
 		if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) {
 			unsigned int weight = 1;
 
-			if (sched_feat(NI_RANDOM) && sd->newidle_ratio < 1024) {
+			if (sched_feat(NI_RANDOM) && sd->newidle_ratio < 1024 &&
+			    !half_idle) {
 				/*
 				 * Throw a 1k sided dice; and only run
 				 * newidle_balance according to the success
@@ -13266,6 +13277,7 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 				weight = (1024 + weight/2) / weight;
 			}
 
+			try_bits |= (1UL << idx);
 			pulled_task = sched_balance_rq(this_cpu, this_rq,
 						   sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE,
 						   &continue_balancing);
@@ -13290,6 +13302,17 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 			break;
 	}
 
+	if (sched_feat(NI_RANDOM) && !half_idle &&
+	    !(pulled_task || !continue_balancing)) {
+		s64 remain_idle = this_rq->avg_idle - curr_cost;
+
+		if (remain_idle > 0 &&
+		    remain_idle >= this_rq->avg_idle / 2) {
+			half_idle = remain_idle;
+			goto retry;
+		}
+	}
+
 	raw_spin_rq_lock(this_rq);
 
 	if (curr_cost > this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost)
-- 
2.34.1


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-05-18 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260518124346.4010277-1-luogengkun2@huawei.com \
    --to=luogengkun2@huawei.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®