mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
	tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] writeback: drop now-unnecessary rcu_barrier() in cgroup_writeback_umount()
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 21:53:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518135349.1187628-3-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518135349.1187628-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

Commit e1b849cfa6b6 ("writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when
switching inodes") replaced the queue_rcu_work() based scheduling of
inode wb switches with a plain queue_work().  Since then no switcher
goes through call_rcu(), so rcu_barrier() in cgroup_writeback_umount()
has no callbacks of its own to wait for.  It still drains unrelated
call_rcu() callbacks from other subsystems on busy systems, which
incidentally slows umount down; drop it.

Fixes: e1b849cfa6b6 ("writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when switching inodes")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 6766de9f9d75..325a30cc35bf 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1248,11 +1248,6 @@ void cgroup_writeback_umount(struct super_block *sb)
 		 * will then drain it.
 		 */
 		synchronize_rcu();
-		/*
-		 * Use rcu_barrier() to wait for all pending callbacks to
-		 * ensure that all in-flight wb switches are in the workqueue.
-		 */
-		rcu_barrier();
 		flush_workqueue(isw_wq);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.43.7


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-18 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-18 13:53 [PATCH v3 0/3] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() Baokun Li
2026-05-18 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Baokun Li
2026-05-18 13:53 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2026-05-20  8:46   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] writeback: drop now-unnecessary rcu_barrier() in cgroup_writeback_umount() Jan Kara
2026-05-20 11:38     ` Baokun Li
2026-05-18 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] writeback: use a per-sb counter to drain inode wb switches at umount Baokun Li
2026-05-19  6:33   ` Baokun Li
2026-05-20  8:57   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260518135349.1187628-3-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®